 | | | | | | | |
| | | 게시자: 2008 7월 16 06:29 의 yunus amoyee yokaa edoway mee | THE WORLD NATIONS FLAGS Stock Photo: Pigeon
http://images.google.co.id/imgres?imgurl=http://northport.k12.ny.us/~patch/intlaw/news.h1.gif&imgrefurl=http://northport.k12.ny.us/~patch/intlaw/news.htm&h=589&w=854&sz=25&hl=id&start=687&tbnid=wt50ObpnDfkAeM:&tbnh=100&tbnw=145&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dfree%2Bwest%2Bpapua%26start%3D672%26gbv%3D2%26ndsp%3D21%26hl%3Did%26sa%3DN
northport.k12.ny.us/~patch/intlaw/news.htm
freedom in other countries. This site also analyzes religious, political, and civil liberties by countries. This is a wonderful resource loaded with charts and graphs. ex blue-free, yellow partly-free, red-not free 
 Zimbabwe  Switzerland Vanuatu  Venezuela  United States of America United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Tuvalu  Tonga Sweden  Solomon Islands
WEST PAPUA THEY NEVER COUNT 2003 ALL CARTOONSAustraliaFree Trade unilateral bilateral Kelly illo 
Click on title for link!
Asia Pacific Journalism, 8 May 2008
Groups seeking independence for West Papua have in the past been divided. Now, reports James Murray, unity is the buzzword and activists have joined forces.
West Papuans hoping for wrest independence have taken an important step with the formation of a coalition designed to unify the country’s resistance to Indonesian rule.
The West Papua National Coalition for Liberation (WPNCL) was set up after a meeting held in Port Vila, Vanuatu, last month.
Richard Yoweni of the National Liberation Army of West Papua was elected as chairman.
The coalition allows the West Papuan people to protect and reclaim its resources and culture said coalition spokesperson Clemens Runawery.
“Indonesian government control over West Papua for the past 45 years and the implementation of its so-called ‘special autonomy’ package in the past five years has grossly failed the West Papuan people,” he said.
Runawery is a West Papuan politician who has lived in exile since the so-called Act of Free Choice handed control of West Papua to Indonesia in 1969.
He said that under the Indonesian administration there has been a “rapid deterioration of health and education, an ever increasing wave of the HIV/AIDS disease and huge profiteering from the West Papuan natural resources and rainforests”.
The WPNCL will be based at the West Papuan People’s Representative office in Port Vila. Maire Leadbeater, spokesperson for New Zealand’s Indonesian Human Rights Committee, said Vanuatu’s support was vital as it was hard for the coalition to meet freely in West Papua. Leadbeater was not surprised at Vanuatu’s stance.
“They had to struggle to achieve their own freedom so it’s not just the government, it’s the people as well – they pray for it [West Papuan independence] in their churches. If the Vanuatu government backslides it faces a lot of domestic pressure,” she said.
This view was shared by Pacific-based photojournalist Ben Bohane.
“Vanuatu was the only Pacific nation to join the non-aligned movement during the Cold War and has maintained an independent foreign policy since then,” he said.
Vanuatu’s support for West Papua and the formation of the WPNCL is the first step in presenting a strong, unified Melanesian position to Pacific Island regional bodies.
Bohane says it is important for West Papua to gain the support of regional bodies for the issue to be dealt with by the United Nations.
Runawery says: “WPNCL is now seeking observer status with the Melanesian Spearhead Group and the Pacific Islands Forum as a platform for the people of West Papua within the UN and other international forums.”
Groups such as the Melanesian Spearhead Group will benefit from this unity when the West Papua issue is brought up at the Pacific Island Forum. The forum does not necessarily support West Papuan independence.
“Since the issue has been ‘swept under the tapa mat’ by the forum for so long, we have to say that the forum is not neutral but anti-West Papua. This has been because of pressure from Australia, Indonesia and Papua New Guinea to keep it off the agenda,” says Bohane.
The WPNCL also protests against the international investment of companies with extensive interests in the resource rich area such as BP in Tangguh and Freeport, which operates the Grasberg copper mine.
Bohane says “having considerable resources has been a curse, not a blessing for the West Papuans”.
“BP, like every other mining company, is exploiting the situation there, particularly if they are relying on Indonesian military for security,” he says.
BP’s liquefied natural gas project in Tangguh may eventually be worth $100 billion dollars and the Grasberg copper mine is one of the world’s largest sources of precious metals contributing heavily to Freeport’s estimated worth of $26 billion.
Guardian journalist John Vidal writes that Papuan leaders were pleased with BP’s initial humanitarian efforts. The company was keen to avoid the experiences of extraction companies in Africa and South America where they have been accused of exploiting local communities.
“BP completely rebuilt one fishing village, poured money into the nearby communities, and employed leading environment, human rights and health groups to advise them on how to avoid conflict and bring prosperity to the villages,” wrote Vidal.
However, relations have started to turn sour with indigenous Papuans becoming frustrated at the number of Indonesian immigrants taking jobs in the area - jobs that have not been offered to West Papuans. They also accuse BP of taking sides with the Indonesian government to ensure that they have access to the Tangguh resources.
Protests by the Free West Papua (UK) group have been lodged at BP’s Tangguh Independent Advisory Panel (TIAP) meeting. They claim that BP has ignored abuses of human rights including the long-term imprisonment of West Papuans accused of raising the indigenous Morning Star flag.
They say Indonesian soldiers had threatened to shoot a Papuan who had erected a banner saying “Welcome Prince Andrew to the land of Papua – the Land of Genocide” during the prince’s recent visit as the UK business envoy.
Tapol, the Indonesian Human Rights Campaign, has written to BP to warn that they have caused instability in the region. They say Papuans “see them as a collaborator with Jakarta’s exploitation of West Papua’s natural resources”.
Runawery said the role of companies such as BP had been “disastrous” and was causing Papuans to become a minority in their own country. The investment of BP and Freeport had “effectively underwritten the occupation of West Papua by the Indonesian security forces”.
“The expansion of Indonesian government backed businesses and economic interests is at the expense of the people of West Papua,” said Runawery, in a reference to tight military controls, a lack of political freedom and the abuse of human rights.
Considering the large financial incentive that the Indonesian government has to keep control of West Papua it may be some time before their dream of independence is realised.
Bohane believes West Papua will be independent at some point but that it will take time.
The formation of the WPNCL was certainly a step in the right direction though.
“It is hard to be optimistic. However, it is a significant development to have the realisation of a unified command and leadership under WPNCL which will give the independence movement a better chance of success in its international diplomacy,” he said.
The first moves of this unified command will be to get West Papua on the UN Decolonisation Committee and to seek to repeal the Act of Free Choice.
James Murray is a Graduate Diploma in Journalism student at AUT University and this is an Asia-Pacific Journalism assignment.
IMAGE: Thanks to The Australian and Bill Leak cartoons. This cartoon was created in reply to an Indonesian cartoon at the height of the "furore by media" between Australia and Indonesia in April 2006. The folks at TAPOL, the UK-based Indonesian human rights campaign, regularly issue Bulletins about issues and events in Indonesia related to outstanding human rights problems. In December 2005, several reports about West Papua were published. First there was the Dutch government-commissioned Drooglever report 'Een Daad Van Vrije Keuze', secondly there was a New York Times investigation into the dealings with West Papuans by and on behalf of Freeport Mining, who operate the world's largest goldmine in the Carstensz mountains. It seems that since December '05 things are starting to escalate around West Papua, so it's not surprising that TAPOL dedicates a large section of the Bulletin to the issues in Papua. Famine and neglect in a land of plenty Tapol Bulletin No 181
Issued December 2005 Tapol - THE INDONESIA HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN
111 Northwood Road, Thornton Heath, Surrey CR7 8HW, UK
Tel +44 (0)20 8771 2904 Fax +44 (0)20 8653 0322
Email tapol@gn.apc.org Website http://www.tapol.org Related pages 10 April 2006: Pieter J Drooglever, An Act of Free Choice? - the Papuans of Western New Guinea and the limitations of the right to self determination. An English summary of the Dutch Government-commissioned report into the handover of Irian Jaya to the UN under the New York Agreement in 1962 and the Indonesian - and stacked - Referendum of 1969. 31 March 2006: The Secret War Against The Defenseless People Of West Papua - "If the history of human rights is not the history of great power's impunity, the UN must return to West Papua, as it did finally to East Timor." Essays and writings by John Pilger, Clinton Fernandes and Marni Cordell. 4 February 2006: Rallying for the Papuans - Photo Reports from around Australia - Within a week of the 43 Papuans arriving near Weipa in Queensland, Australians voted with their feet, and rallies were held in several states. Here are the photos from Melbourne, Sydney, Darwin, as well as some images taken on Christmas Island. 31 January 2006: Free West Papua, Let Them Stay! - A forum in Fremantle about the West Papuan asylum seekers and their reasons for the trip from Merauke to Weipa in Queensland with Senator Kerry Nettle, advocate Kaye Bernard, Project SafeCom's Jack Smit and Australian West Papua Association supporter Ned Byrne. 22 January 2006: Inside the Grasberg Mine: an exasperating New York Times key feature investigation on West Papua's Freeport Mine. Published in December 2005, the article is already found on dozens of locations on the internet, and perhaps it's a study that will break the stranglehold on a situation that's both environmentally unsustainable, politically corrupt and an abhorrence in terms of human rights and ecological responsibility.  21 January 2006: Raise the Flag and Cry Merdeka - The first traditional Papuan boat, a canoe with outriggers, arrived on Australian shores this week from West Papua. The heat is on the Howard government especially because the Indonesian government allegedly embarked upon "revenge attacks" against family members of those who made the journey. This is a background briefing on the issues at stake.
Contents list: The 1969 Act of Free Choice, intended to be an act of self-determination for the people of West Papua, was a 'sham' and doomed to failure from the outset, indicates a landmark report commissioned by the Dutch government. The 700-page report by historian Professor Pieter Drooglever was launched by the Institute of Dutch History in the Hague on 15 November 2005. It supports the Papuans' persistent contention that the 1969 vote was a fraud and the root cause of their problems to this day. The Papuans' fate was sealed when Indonesia's autocratic President, Suharto, whose army was in control of the territory, stipulated that no outcome of the Act of Free Choice 'other than a ruling in favour of Indonesia would be acceptable to him' reveals Drooglever. According to Western observers and Papuans who have spoken out, 'the Act of Free Choice ended up as a sham where a press-ganged electorate acting under a great deal of pressure appeared to have unanimously declared itself in favour of Indonesia,' This led to decades of harsh military rule and violence during which 'not a day went by ... when no one died or no one was seriously mistreated ...' Figures running into the tens of thousands have been mentioned' for the number of people who fell victim, notes Drooglever. West Papua's abundant natural resources have been ruthlessly exploited for the benefit of the military, the Indonesian treasury, and the elite in Jakarta, leaving the Papuan population as 'one of the poorest groups in Indonesia'. All this has resulted from persistent and disastrous failures of policy by the Netherlands, Indonesia and the international community. Since the 1960s, the Papuans have suffered from the Netherlands' failure to oversee a successful decolonisation process, from Jakarta's reliance on repression to subjugate the Papuan people, and the international community's failure to protect the rights of the indigenous population. Above all, the Papuans have suffered from the failure of those in power to respect their right to determine their own future and control their own affairs free from violence and oppression. But, says Drooglever, hope for the future lies in 'the possibilities of Papuan society itself, which has produced the necessary self-control, wisdom and resilience to ensure its survival' and in the 'dignified and insistent manner' in which leading Papuans in church and society have brought the voice of the Papuans to the world's attention. It also lies in the interest shown by the international community, which can be a driving force for change and may have unfulfilled responsibilities under international law. Professor Drooglever, was set his task by the Dutch government in 2000, following a request from the Dutch parliament, to conduct historical research into the events surrounding the Act of Free Choice. He completed the project despite a lack of co-operation from the Indonesian authorities who refused him access to its archives and permission to enter the country. In a statement, TAPOL welcomed the Drooglever report. It urged the interested parties, especially the Indonesian government and military, to avoid knee-jerk responses, to reflect carefully on and learn from the report's findings, and to seek peaceful ways, through dialogue and negotiation, to resolve the historical and contemporary injustices suffered by the Papuan people. Drooglever cites with approval a statement by former Indonesian foreign minister, Adam Malik, that 'the army would first have to be withdrawn before Papuan society would be able to develop'. That remains true to this day, but, as Drooglever points out, since Malik spoke, the pressure exerted by the army and police on the population has only increased. A reversal of this trend - now accelerating with the deployment of large numbers of additional territorial and combat troops - would be a start and a sign of Indonesia's commitment to a political solution to the conflict. In 1949, sovereignty over the territories of the former Dutch East Indies apart from West Papua (then known as Dutch New Guinea), was formally transfered to the Republic of Indonesia following a Round Table Conference between the Netherlands and Indonesia. For strategic reasons - and because of 'the entirely different national character and the virtual absence of Indonesian nationalistic sentiment among the population' - the Dutch, despite Indonesian objections, retained West Papua with a view to developing the territory and setting it on course for self-determination. However, Indonesia persisted with its claim to sovereignty. This led to threats of military action and low-level incursions at the beginning of the 1960s. Under pressure from the US, which was anxious to avoid Indonesia falling under Communist influence in the Cold War, the Dutch entered into the UN-brokered 'New York Agreement' with Indonesia on 15 August 1962. The agreement provided for an initial transfer of power of West Papua to the UN to be followed by a transfer to Indonesia. An Act of Free Choice would then take place within six years, before the end of 1969. Drooglever notes that the New York Agreement was vaguely worded on a number of essential points, including the duration of the UN transition period and the guarantees for the implementation of an internationally acceptable referendum. The Papuans were not a party to the Agreement and were not even consulted despite the fact that by 1961 there existed 'the unmistakable beginning of the formation of a Papuan state' with the adoption of a flag and national anthem and the establishment of a New Guinea Council. 'By the end of 1961 onwards, Jakarta's behaviour, both in word and deed, was outright threatening,' says Drooglever. After the end of Dutch rule in 1962, 'the UN administration [UNTEA - the UN Temporary Executive Authority] lacked the necessary power, the will and the expertise to bring about a truly neutral interim phase,' he says. By then, 'Indonesian soldiers and officials were pouring into the country in far larger numbers than planned and quickly took control. They exerted heavy pressure on the Papuans to choose their side publicly and to give up the dream of self-determination. Drooglever notes that 'the first signs of the violent action taken by the Indonesian military, which would also characterise the new administration in the coming decades, soon appeared. Rapid impoverishment ensued, together with a substantial decline in legal certainty and a loss of civil rights across the board ... This led to increasingly negative reactions from the Papuans. The number of victims quickly rose into the thousands'. The process leading to the Act of Free Choice itself got underway in the summer of 1968 with the arrival of the UN Secretary General's special representative, Ortiz Sanz. Indonesian pressure meant that his team was kept very small, 16 members in total. Drooglever describes how Sanz was overrun with petitions from Papuans complaining about Indonesian mismanagement in all kinds of areas. His referral of the complaints to his Indonesian counterpart was regarded as inappropriate interference. Sanz' advice on the form of the referendum was disregarded and a traditional Indonesian system under which only collective decisions and perfect consensus was possible, was chosen. Sanz' team was not allowed to play any part in putting together the electorate and was given the smallest possible role in the implementation of the referendum itself. In the event, only 1,022 Papuans out of a population of around 700,000 took part [see separate item, 'UN failed to ensure free choice']. When the matter was considered by the UN in November 1969, the Secretary General, U Thant, was able to conclude only that an Act of Free Choice had been held. Drooglever says 'he was unable to use the definite article because the representative value of the operation had been far below the standards laid down in the Agreement of New York' [italics added]. The UN General Assembly failed to endorse the Secretary General's report, but simply 'took cognisance' of it. Regrettably, that was then considered sufficient to remove West Papua from the UN agenda. Michel Pelletier was a member of the UN team which was supposed to assist Indonesia with the implementation of the 1969 Act of Free Choice. Following the release of Professor Pieter Drooglever's definitive report into the controversial process, TAPOL spoke to Pelletier about his experiences. They included being threatened by an Indonesian soldier at gunpoint. It is clear from what he recalls that the UN, under intense military and political pressure from Indonesia, did little to ensure that a genuine act of self-determination took place according to international standards. Michel Pelletier went to West Papua (then known as West Irian) as a 28 year-old UN observer in the autumn of 1968. It was a time when the world was going through a momentous period of decolonisation and he arrived with an idealistic expectation that he would be involved in "something important". But he was soon disillusioned by the very limited ability he and his colleagues had to fulfill their role. They were forced to operate in an "isolated vacuum", which meant they had no way of finding out much of what was happening outside their small compound near to the West Papuan capital, Jayapura. The presence of the Indonesian military was overwhelming, he recalls, not just in terms of numbers, but also in the sense of "hovering over the whole thing". One of his earliest memories was the shock he felt at the impoverished state of the territory. In his view, it was deplorable that much of what the Dutch had done to develop West Papua had been destroyed. The people were extremely poor, there were no stores in Jayapura and medical facilities were non-existent. According to the 1962 New York Agreement between Indonesia and the Netherlands, the UN was supposed to 'advise, assist and participate' in arrangements for the Act of Free Choice, which was to be carried out 'in accordance with international practice'. A number of UN experts were to remain in the territory following the transfer of administrative control to Indonesia in 1963. However, Jakarta made it clear that no UN officials would be allowed to stay. This meant there was no UN presence until the Secretary-General's special representative, Ortiz Sanz, arrived in August 1968. The UN did not therefore fulfill its designated role and Indonesia was free to act as it pleased. The UN team, headed by Ortiz Sanz, was originally supposed to comprise 50 members - grossly inadequate in itself for a territory the size of California with a population then of around 700,000 - but in the event it was reduced to 25 and then just 16 members at Indonesia's insistence. They included Ortiz Sanz, a number of advisers and administrative staff and five observers. The observers' task was to monitor every aspect of the implementation of the New York Agreement, including provisions guaranteeing freedom of speech, movement and assembly. Their ability to do this was considerably curtailed by severe restrictions on their own freedom of movement - permission from the Indonesians was required for all their travel around the territory. Another flagrant breach of the Agreement. Any monitoring, they were able to undertake was inevitably "superficial", says Pelletier, as the small team was normally able to be in only one place at a time. They had no interpreter for several months and had to rely on what the Indonesians told them. At times, there was so little for them to do that they were given "made-up" jobs, such as investigating the education system. The observers received a number of reports about the maltreatment of Papuans, of people being killed after crossing the border from neighbouring Papua New Guinea, and of violence against Papuans in places such as Fak Fak and Sorong. The reports were passed on to Ortiz Sanz, but the observers were unable to investigate further. According to Drooglever, the number of victims had quickly risen 'into the thousands' soon after the Indonesian takeover in 1963. The observers were aware of several demonstrations by Papuans, but were prevented by the Indonesians from witnessing them. On the one occasion when Pelletier did attempt to attend a demonstration in Jayapura he was stopped in his car by an Indonesian soldier and told not to proceed. When he failed to turn round fast enough, the agitated soldier stuck a gun in his stomach to reinforce his order. Understandably, Pelletier was extremely frightened and remains angry about what happened. The incident was reported, but there were apparently no repercussions. It is reasonable to assume from this outrageous treatment of a UN official that the Indonesians had similar scant regard for the rights of the Papuans as Drooglever indeed confirms. Contact with Papuans was extremely limited. They were stopped from coming to see the UN team and from visiting the UN compound. Persons submitting petitions were not allowed to discuss them with the team. The extraordinary lengths to which Indonesia went to prevent contact with local people were illustrated by an incident in which a number of armed Indonesian soldiers attempted to forcibly remove one of the UN team, Marshall Williams, from the compound because he was black and resembled a Papuan. Pelletier's memories of the act of free choice itself - which, against the advice of Ortiz Sanz, was in the form of a traditional Indonesian musyawarah consultation, involving 1,022 selected representatives out of a population of around 700,000 - was of a series of meetings in the presence of non-uniformed military personnel in which the participants were told to raise their hands and all duly obliged. Normal election procedures were not followed. The 'vote' took place in an incongruous carnival atmosphere, with Indonesian flags everywhere. Papuans, who were normally naked, were bizarrely dressed in smart shorts and shirts, recalls Pelletier, who witnessed the event in the highland town of Wamena. Most election experts would agree that the implausible 100 per cent vote for inclusion in Indonesia is in itself evidence that the process was a fraud. The UN team was made to leave West Papua and Indonesia as soon as the vote was over. Pelletier had wanted to take a short break in Bali, but was not allowed to stay on. He remains deeply unhappy about the way the process was conducted. His memory of similar processes in other countries was of long lines of people queuing to vote, being intent on expressing their views and being allowed to do so. Recently retired, Pelletier worked for the UN for over 30 years and served in Africa, Asia, and South America, but says he never experienced anything like the Act of Free Choice, before or since. Undoubtedly, the UN's conduct in relation to the Act of Free Choice was in stark contrast to its involvement in East Timor, where despite the appalling violence and intimidation, it was scrupulous in ensuring that the administration of the August 1999 'popular consultation' was free and fair. Pelletier agrees with the general conclusion of those who have said the act of free choice was a 'sham' and a 'whitewash' and is in no doubt that a similar process would not be tolerated to the international community today. In a separate development, two members of the US Congress, Eni Faleomavaega (D - American Samoa) and Donald Payne (D - New Jersey) have urged African nations to request a review of the UN's actions in Papua. A number of African countries expressed strong criticism of the Act of Free Choice when the matter was considered by the UN general assembly in 1969. The Congressmen were responding to a letter they received from the UN secretary-General, Kofin Annan, in which he said he would consider a review of the UN's involvement if the general assembly requested it. It is salutary that the Congressmen are using every opportunity to keep the issue of West Papua alive in Washington. [For more information on the UN involvement in the Act of Free Choice, see Dr John Saltford, The United Nations and the Indonesian Takeover of West Papua, 1962-1969: The Anatomy of a Betrayal, Routledge Curzon 2003 (hardback book) and Saltford, United Nations Involvement with the act of self-determination in West Irian (Indonesian West New Guinea) 1968 to 1969 (22-page article), Indonesia 69, Cornell University, April 2000, available from TAPOL]. The publication of the report by Professor Pieter Drooglever of the Institute of Dutch History on the 1969 Act of Free Choice has attracted responses from many countries which will help to internationalise the issue of Papua. In an attempt to distance their governments from the event, neither the Indonesian Government nor the Dutch Government sent representatives to the launch. Both governments refrained from making any response, probably afraid that the report might provoke calls for a 'historical rectification' of the 1969 vote and for a referendum to be held. No fewer than eleven Papuans from all parts of West Papua made the trip to The Netherlands, at their own expense, eager to hear the results of the investigation concerning a matter that has been at the core of their grievances for nearly forty years. Most of the Papuans were representing their local Dewan Adat (Tribal Council). They attended both the launch on 15 November and a seminar held later in the week, and took advantage of their presence in The Netherlands to meet the many Papuans living in the country. They virtually took over the presentation ceremony on 15 November and went on to the podium to sing the Papuan national anthem. On 18 November, a one-day seminar was held in Amersfoort, followed the next evening by a well-attended public meeting. The Papuans who addressed the public meeting on 19 November were Thom Beanal, the chair of Dewan Adat Papua (Papuan Tribal Council), Thaha Mohamed Alhamid General Secretary of the Papuan Presidium Council (PDP) and Wilhelmina Woy, representing the Fak-Fak Tribal Council. Thom Beanal spoke about the grave injustice of the Act of Free Choice while Thaha Alhamid gave an account of Papuan efforts to hold dialogue with the authorities in Jakarta. He explained that in the period following the downfall of the authoritarian President Suharto in May 1998, there was for the first time a greater willingness in Jakarta to respond to Papuan concerns. Under President B.J. Habibie, who took power after the fall of Suharto, a team of one hundred Papuans went to Jakarta and had a meeting with the President. Habibie appeared to listen carefully to their representations but did little more than say that he would look into the matter. From then on, all efforts to seek dialogue during the presidencies of Abdurrachman Wahid, Megawati Sukarnoputri and the current president, Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, went downhill and failed to get any response. Several weeks before the Drooglever report, Een Daad van Vrije Keuze (An Act of Free Choice) was due to appear, there were attempts in the Indonesian press to discredit the Dutch historian. A Jakarta fortnightly, Intelijen, carried extensive coverage in September about the forthcoming report. A man described as being one of Indonesia's intelligence experts, Djanda, was asked who was inciting the Papuans to press for independence. His response was: 'It's people like Drooglever and Langenberger (sic), Dutch intellectuals who feel they have been betrayed by Indonesia. Their sense of betrayal means that they want to humiliate Indonesia. Just wait till 15 November when Drooglever and Langenberger hold a seminar.' He described Drooglever as not only an intellectual but also an intel, who was probably lobbied by the socialists. 'He has been stirring up Papua. He is in the pay of the OPM and has for many years been raising Papua and Indonesia on the international forum.' In the words of a spokesman of Indonesia's Foreign Ministry, the Report was 'an academic study which is no different from other studies on Papua'. The spokesman, Yuri Oktavian Thamrin, said: 'The Dutch government recognises Papua as part of Indonesia. That's why the substance of the study has no legal or political relevance to the facts'. Members of the Indonesian Parliament rallied to the side of the government. A member of Parliament's Commission I on Foreign Affairs urged the Indonesian government to 'counter such a finding with solid arguments and to establish lobby groups to stop it from becoming an international issue.' A seminar on West Papua to be held by LIPI, the Indonesia Institute of Sciences, in Jakarta to coincide with publication of the Drooglever report, had to be called off when the Indonesian government indicated that it was not prepared to fund the event. It was suggested that the issue should be discussed by the University of Indonesia. According to LIPI they have not been informed of the reason for the government's decision. Although the request for an investigation was made by a member of the Dutch Parliament and the report was commissioned by a previous Dutch government in 2000, the present government was dismissive of the investigation. The present Dutch Foreign Minister, Ben Bot, was quoted in the Dutch daily, Trouw, as calling the investigation 'superfluous', stating that the initiative had come from his predecessor, J. van Aartsen. Neither is the Dutch Parliament planning to do anything with Professor Drooglever's report. According to the Jakarta Post: Certainly no book will by itself change history, Drooglever's publication has started a momentum that could bring Papuan politics into line with history.' While the Dutch government had signed the so-called New York Agreement with the Indonesian government in 1962, which set the scene for a act of self-determination to take place by the end of 1969, it appears that the Dutch government was not happy to be associated with the investigations, which called the 1969 Act a 'sham', for fear that this might have a detrimental effect on its wide-ranging relations with Indonesia. Clearly economic interests take precedence over any concern for the grievous historic injustice which has been done to the Papuan people. In an editorial following the publication of the report, Australia's leading daily, the Sydney Morning Herald wrote: "There is always merit in setting the record straight, no matter how much time has passed. For the Indonesian province of Papua, it has been a long and bloody 36-year wait. The Papuans have refused to accept the 'Act of Free Choice' by which they supposedly voted to join Indonesia in 1969. A report commissioned by the Dutch government unequivocally vindicates their stand. The resource rich territory of Papua was not included when the Dutch handed over their colonial territories to a new Indonesian nation after World War II. Instead, the Papuans - who share no religious or cultural ties with majority Muslim Indonesia - were promised a popular ballot on independence. But a mere 1,000 or so Papuans participated in the 'sham' rigged vote orchestrated by Jakarta, the report says. The result has been a protracted, debilitating independence struggle, pitting a vicious Indonesian army against ill-equipped Papuan tribes.' One of the speakers to address the seminar on 18 November was Muridan Widjojo, a Research Fellow of the Indonesian Institute of Sciences, LIPI. Muridan is a PhD Candidate in History of Maluku and Papua at Rijksuniversiteit in Leiden. His paper, Bridging the Gap or Pushing Papua out of the Republic? is a carefully structured analysis of the opposing views of Papuans and Indonesians on the status of West Papua, from the perspective of a writer who sympathises with both sides of the argument. After giving an account of the diverse social and religious views of Papuans and the commitment of the PDP and the OPM to a peaceful struggle, he draws attention to what he calls 'the most painful miscommunication between Papuans and policy makers in Jakarta'. From the days of Sukarno up to the present era, sentiments in Indonesia have been deeply nationalistic. Papua is approached as an 'unquestionable issue' and any discussion is seen as a 'threat to the near-sacred "imagined-community" of Indonesia'. Police and TNI officers implicated in such crimes as the murder of Theys Eluay in November 2001 and the Abepura incident in 2000 continue to enjoy impunity and according to some, should be rewarded as 'heroes' for risking their lives to defend the unity of Indonesia. On the Indonesian side of the dispute, he distinguishes between the hardliners in the military and the civilian bureaucracy and those intellectuals who hold moderate points of view. While they share the same desire to defend the Republic, they differ about the strategies and methods for achieving this. The hardliners reject dialogue and go into a panic when they hear Papuan calls for the rectification of history. The moderates on the other hand believe that dialogue and 'straightening' the history of Papua's transfer to the Republic are constructive ways to resolving the conflict in Papua. While the nationalist defence of the unity of the Republic is, he says, understandable, it should be done by winning the hearts of Papuans and not frustrating them even further. He describes the hardliners attitude as 'terribly dangerous', that can only lead to more violence, 'simply push(ing) the Papuans out of the Republic without them being the cause.' The Indonesian government should abandon the illusion that the idea of merdeka can be removed by educating the Papuans, punishing them and disrespecting their human dignity. The consequences of such an erroneous approach is that: 'With every wrong move of Jakarta, the Papuan heart that bleeds with pain and cries for more sovereignty will beat harder and harder. Jakarta seems to provide the spirit and energy for Papuans to remain hopeful of an independent state.' Jakarta may see Special Autonomy as the solution but Muridan argues that it has brought Papuan trust to its lowest level. The reasons are that Papuans have not had the space to determine political and developmental affairs in their own province. The government has systematically ignored respect for human .rights, and the destructive power of corruption, and intervenes in political processes without giving a voice to Papuan civil society groups. Moreover, there is little indication that educational facilities, health services and general prosperity will improve. Above all, says Muridan in conclusion, Jakarta must show a sincere commitment to the dignity of the Papuans as owners of the land. Developments in West Papua are in stark contrast to the progress being made in Aceh. Plans to send more troops have again been announced, while a leaked police document reveals plans for action against activists, particularly those involved in flag-raising. Local communities have expressed strong objections to plans to deploy troops in their localities. The leaked police document, dated 10 November 2005, is proof that the Indonesian authorities are well aware of the depth of dissatisfaction among West Papuans about their plight under Indonesian occupation. The document is an instruction from the chief of police in Papua, Drs D. Sumantyawan, H.S, to police chiefs throughout West Papua, warning of possible 'separatist' actions on certain occasions in November and December. The occasions mentioned as possible triggers for action are the anniversary of the death of Papuan leader, Theys Eluay on 10/11 November, the launch of the Drooglever report on 15 November, West Papua's national day on 1 December and what is described as the anniversary of Melanesian independence on 14 December. Local police commands are instructed to identify local targets and to increase the number of personnel in remote locations, in anticipation of actions by armed groups. Local communities, it says, should be encouraged to organise sporting or other events in places likely to be the venue for protest gatherings, to involve themselves in 'voluntary' work projects under the supervision of the police and army, and to organise religious activities to distract attention from events planned by separatists. Police patrols should be intensified in the towns and in remote areas, on days of possible separatist activity. Raids should be launched to confiscate firearms and other weapons. The police instruction states further that those involved in flag-raising should be arrested and charged with treason (makar). The police are advised not to resort to acts of violence unless this is necessary because of the circumstances, and firearms should only be resorted to on orders from superior officers. This note of caution suggests that the security forces see the need to avoid casualties which could attract international attention. As already reported [see TAPOL Bulletin, No. 179, July 2005], two West Papuans are currently serving sentences of fifteen and ten years for peacefully hoisting the West Papuan Morning Star flag on 1 December 2004. Both men have been adopted as prisoners of conscience by Amnesty International. On 1 December this year, hundreds of students, workers and government employees gathered in Jayapura and yelled: 'Free Papua!' as they blocked roads in Abepura, where the state university, Cendrawasih, is located. According to reports received by the Robert F. Kennedy Memorial Center for Human Rights, the demonstration was initially peaceful. Demonstrators were intending to raise the West Papuan flag on the Trikora field in Abepura where demonstrations in 2004 resulted in the arrest of Filep Karma and Yusak Pakage (the two men now serving sentences of 15 and 10 years) after being blocked by Brimob forces, the crack troops of the police. This year, hundreds (according to some sources, thousands) of Papuans sat down on the roadway blocking the traffic on the road connecting Abepura with Jayapura. The sit-down continued for several hours, until a heavy downpour of rain forced the protesters to seek shelter. According to a report in The Jakarta Post [2 December], the police were determined to keep the pro-independence action low-key. Hundreds of police had been deployed since early morning to prevent anyone raising the flag. Using logs to block the street in front of Cendrawasih University, the disappointed demonstrators pelted stones at university buildings, shattering some windows. The hundreds of independence supporters then marched to the campus of a nearby Protestant bible college and unfurled a banner saying: '44th Anniversary of West Papuan Independence!' Under tight security, they held a rally at which speakers spoke of Papua's incorporation into Indonesia. Two people were detained for putting logs on the road, but police later said they were only held for questioning. Commemorative events also were held in Sentani, near the home of Theys Hiyo Eluay, who was abducted and killed by security forces in November 2001. Prayers were said and an address was delivered condemning the vote held in 1969 which led to Papua's incorporation into Indonesia. In defiance of his jailers, Filep Karma startled the prison authorities by unfurling the Morning Star flag on the prison roof on 1 December. Filep Karma is serving a 15-year sentence. According to The Jakarta Post, Filep Karma said: 'Although I am being kept in jail, it does not dampen my spirit to fight for independence.' He refused however to reveal who smuggled the flag into the jail. He also said that he had done this despite the possible consequences. It was later revealed that his sentence has indeed been extended by decision of the Supreme Court, but at the time of writing, the document announcing the Court's verdict had not been given to him. Traditional communities in villages located in the north-east of West Papua, in the vicinity of Jayapura, have come together in a Coalition to voice their rejection of the deployment of troops of the Indonesian army, the TNI, in their respective villages. In a document dated 21 November 2005, which is based on reliable local sources, they itemise the placement of units of fifteen soldiers in their kampungs (a kampung is the lowest-level residential unit in Indonesian cities and towns). The report give details about placements in a number of districts in the vicinity of Jayapura, the Districts of West Sentani, Nimbokrang, Nimboran, Namblong, Kemtuk Gresi, Demta, Depapre and Kaureh. For example, in the District of Demta, a local inhabitant identified only by the initials DY reported that the district military commander had visited him to inform him that security personnel would be placed in three kampungs. Another informant, LW, described how an army officer had informed him that troops would be deployed from 9 November till the end of December, and would be billeted in the homes of the inhabitants. In both cases, the informants said they rejected the presence of military personnel in their kampungs. Similar reports of deployment were included in the Coalition's report for all the other districts. In two kampungs in the District of Kaureh, it was stated that twelve military personnel would be located in all the nine barracks of a local company, PT Sinar Mas, which means that a total of 108 soldiers would be deployed in that location. A note in the concluding section of the report explains that the authorities claimed that the deployments were necessary because of the alleged disappearance of a helicopter on 12 October but no villagers had seen or heard a helicopter flying in the area. After extensive searches, no helicopter was found and local people concluded that the story was simply a pretext to justify the deployment of additional troops. The report stated in conclusion that local communities reject the deployment of additional troops 'because there already are Koramil and Polsek (army and police) command stations in these locations. So what need is there for more security personnel since conditions in the area are very peaceful, there is no war in progress and the people are busily engaged in their gardens, out at sea, taking their children to school and a number of other social activities? Two British-supplied Tactica armoured personnel carriers fitted with water cannons have been deployed to West Papua to be used against protestors. The very presence of the vehicles is a powerful deterrent to Papuans wishing to participate in public events and a flagrant breach of their rights to freedom of assembly and expression. The water cannons have arrived in West Papua at a time of heightened tension. Large numbers of additional troops are being sent to the territory and the police have been under instructions to prevent people participating in public actions on a number of important dates in November and December [see separate article, 'Security forces on high alert']. TAPOL understands that the vehicles were sent to the West Papuan capital, Jayapura, from Aceh at the beginning of August. They were present during a large demonstration against special autonomy on 12 August and at a protest against the establishment of the Papuan People's Assembly (MRP) at the Governor's office on 31 October. The Foreign Office in London says that the water cannons were also used on an unspecified date to break up a violent demonstration aimed at an office of the Indonesian Electoral Commission. Information about this demonstration is extremely sketchy and has not been confirmed. Serious questions would in any event have to be asked about the cause of the alleged violence given the propensity of the security forces to start or provoke incidents by the use of heavy-handed tactics or other means. An informed source has told TAPOL that a salt/liquid soap solution has been added to the water in the cannons to produce a tear gas-like effect on those targeted. This is a common practice in Indonesia where water cannons were used on many occasions in the 1990s against the pro-democracy movement opposed to the Suharto dictatorship. The water cannon vehicles were licensed for export to Indonesia by the Conservative government in the 1990s. A number of them were not delivered until after Tony Blair's Labour government came to power in May 1997. It controversially refused to revoke the export licences despite promising an 'ethical dimension' to its foreign policy. The Tacticas were made by Glover Webb, a company then owned by GKN, which has since been absorbed into the BAE Systems conglomerate. UK parliamentarians opposed to arms sales to Indonesia have reacted angrily to the deployment of the wa | |
|
| | | 게시자: 2008 6월 17 22:37 의 Deleted member | ALL NEWS OF THE FRONT PEPERA PB 2
[PDF]Rewiev articlesJenis Berkas: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Versi HTML
where it stimulates activity front of the migrating motor complex (MMC) through ..... Konturek SJ, Pepera J, Zabielski, et al. Brain-gut axis in pancreatic ...
www.jpp.krakow.pl/journal/archive/1205_s6/pdf/5_1205_s6_article_old.pdf - Halaman sejenis |
bodipost wrote 6 days ago : Front Pepera PB Jogyakarta, FrontPeperaPB – Puluhan Masyarakat dan Mahasiswa Papua di Jogyakarta yang bergabung dalam Front...ta.wordpress.com/tag/aksi-massa/ - 55k - Tembolok - Halaman sejenis |
Den Haag, Pepera, Penentuan Pendapat Rakyat Papua pada tahun 1969 adalah sebuah ..... ( PB NU) untuk menjelaskan sikap pemerintahnya terkait persoalan Papua. ...www.infopapua.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=index&catid=&topic=2&allstories=1 - Halaman sejenis |
Physiol Rev 86:805–847[Abstract/Free Full Text]; Konturek SJ, Pepera J, ..... Facchinetti P, Bourgeat P, Bambal RB, Bishop PB, Chan SMT, Moore ANJ, ...endo.endojournals.org/cgi/content/full/149/6/2826 - Halaman sejenis |
Front Persatuan Perjuangan Rakyat Papua Barat. ( Front PEPERA PB ) Jurubicara Nasional Arkilaus Baho Mobile +6285244979620 ...media-intim.blogspot.com/2007/11/media-intim-tanah-longsor-tutup-gedung.html - 112k - Tembolok - Halaman sejenis |
JENNIE MAE PEPERA, 77, of 1890 Apple died Sunday at a local nursing home. ...... back on to his right side of the road a front wheel ran off the pavement. ...freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~muskegoncounty/Contributions/P.htm - 460k - Tembolok - Halaman sejenis |
KK.AMP.JOGYA: periode 2002-2008 · KK.AMP.JOGYA: periode 2002-2008 image loaded DEMO Aksinya Front Pepera Pb 01-mei 2008 (on May 5) ...us.dada.net/edowayd/ - 77k - Tembolok - Halaman sejenis |
... f Timber Industries Ltd. C. M. Ghassoub Sawmills Ltd. n R. K. Pepera 1 Co. ...... A front-end loader would then transport the sawdust to the dry storage ...www-wds.worldbank.org/.../IW3P/IB/1999/08/15/000009265_3960928080321/Rendered/INDEX/multi0page.txt - 252k - Tembolok - Halaman sejenis |
Ketika Negara Berhadapan dengan Neo Liberalisme · Ketua Front Pepera PB.K.I Diincar Intelijen NKRI Semalam Dirumahnya · Kesaksian dari Seorang Korban FPI ...abasrin.wordpress.com/2007/11/07/lowongan-pekerjaan-admin-sales-dan-staf-gudang/ - 31k - Tembolok - Halaman sejenis |
Bagi Front PEPERA PB akumulasi dari upaya persaingan elit suku sampai pada sabotase lahan bisnis aparat di areal freeport inilah memicu konlfik perang suku ...media-banten.blogspot.com/2007/10/media-banten-solidaritas-papua-untuk_26.html - 110k - Tembolok - Halaman sejenis |
6 Agu 2007 ... REFEREE: Pepera Hetti Kamkanamge (Sri Lanka). ...... With Sunil Chetri and Baichung Bhutia leading from the front and are looking better, ...www.indianfootball.com/news/m200708.html - 194k - Tembolok - Halaman sejenis |
KK.AMP.JOGYA: periode 2002-2008 · KK.AMP.JOGYA: periode 2002-2008 image loaded DEMO Aksinya Front Pepera Pb 01-mei 2008 (on 5 May) ...no.dada.net/edowayd/ - 73k - Tembolok - Halaman sejenis |
Front Neuroendocrinol. 19:73-99. 2. Dufresne M, Seva C, Fourmy D 2006 Cholecystokinin and gastrin receptors. Physiol Rev. 86:805-847. 3. Konturek SJ, Pepera...endo.endojournals.org/cgi/rapidpdf/en.2007-1772v1.pdf - Halaman sejenis |
Tk. I chaired by its Chairman, Nathaniel Kaiway, SH and the "Team-100 PB" ...... The people of West Papua reject the results of Pepera held in 1969 for the ...www.angelfire.com/journal/issues/irian3_22_00.html - 420k - Tembolok - Halaman sejenis |
... AMP (Aliansi Mahasiswa Papua), Front PEPERA PB ( Front Perjuangan Pembebasan Rakyat Papua Barat) ... Jawa Barat - Sikap Front Kedaulatan Rakyat pada 21. ...serikat-tani-nasional.blogspot.com/2007/09/pernyataan-sikap-tentang-tugas-mendesak.html - 64k - Tembolok - Halaman sejenis |
KK.AMP.JOGYA: periode 2002-2008 · KK.AMP.JOGYA: periode 2002-2008 hình đã tải DEMO Aksinya Front Pepera Pb 01-mei 2008 (trên 5 Tháng năm) ...vn.dada.net/edowayd/ - 75k - Tembolok - Halaman sejenis |
Hearing this the reed-players gather together in front of the drums. ..... G pepera. 21. C zika. 11. F veve. Such a set is called a motaba. (Fig. 5, P1. ...links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0307-3114(193307%2F12)63%3C313%3ATREOSA%3E2.0.CO%3B2-B - Halaman sejenis |
Refresca a página para ver as alterações efectuadas. Atualizar. DEMO Aksinya Front Pepera Pb 01-mei 2008 DEMO Aksinya Front Pepera Pb 01-mei 2008 ...br.dada.net/edowayd/ - 77k - Tembolok - Halaman sejenis |
Pertemuan antara Front PEPERA Konsulat Indonesia, wilayah Jawa Barat, ... kedua Delegasi itupun menerima statment Politik yang di buat oleh Font PEPERA PB. ...tionghoanet.blogspot.com/2008/05/inti-net-ketua-komite-khusus.html - 83k - Tembolok - Halaman sejenis |
Barkha has reported the Kargil War from the front to the devastation of the ...... Papuan people continuing from the Act of Free Choice1969 ( PEPERA 1969). ...palashspeaks.blog.co.uk/2008/01/ - Halaman sejenis |
[PDF]Jenis Berkas: PDF/Adobe Acrobat
R. K. Pepera 1 Co. Ltd. Ashanti Curl & Lumber Co, Ltd. NMak Company Ltd. ......front plate. The flue gas would then be directed through the boilers as ...
www-wds.worldbank.org/.../WDSP/IB/1999/08/15/000009265_3960928080321/Rendered/PDF/multi0page.pdf - Halaman sejenis |
( P. B.). EN ANGLAIS:. Rail at a liar. Repel a leper. Name no one man. ...... -Pepa lo conoCco, lo papé; - Pepera, mira Pepe; -Prepara teta te raparé ...www.albaiges.com/cpi/s67-web.htm - 237k - Tembolok - Halaman sejenis |
Namanya keren, sama, tapi tidak sama persis seperti nama Front kita, Front Persatuan Perjuangan Rakyat Papua Barat [ Front PEPERA PB]. ...papuandiary.blogspot.com/2007_06_19_archive.html - 78k - Tembolok - Halaman sejenis |
[PDF]Jenis Berkas: PDF/Adobe Acrobat
Shook front ahmoture. h boundary struoturo are dirouared with ompharhr on ...... Abstracts of a m forty pepera ?om. the. a i n part of the report. ...
ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19640057645_1964057645.pdf - Halaman sejenis |
AMP- FRONT- PEPERA- PB AMP- FRONT- PEPERA- PB Posts: 3; HI.... GOVERNMENT OF NKRI & TNI-POLRI DON'T BE CREASY CAUSE OF WEST PAPUA (updated on January 31) ...us.dada.net/ampunyanews/ - 57k - Tembolok - Halaman sejenis |
... WALHI DKI Jakarta, API (Aliansi Petani Indonesia), AMP (Aliansi Mahasiswa Papua), Front PEPERA PB ( Front Perjuangan Pembebasan Rakyat Papua Barat) ...mimbardemokrasi.blogspot.com/2007/10/tuntaskan-penyelidikan-kasus-kasus.html - 45k - Tembolok - Halaman sejenis |
...P.B., 'A Gilbertese Song', Journal of the Polynesian Society, 62:4 (1953), ...... C.D., 'After Pepera: "free choice" - in three acts', New Guinea & ...ftp://coombs.anu.edu.au/coombspapers/coombsarchives/pacific-asian-history/pac-jnl-bibl.txt - 843k - Tembolok - Halaman sejenis |
[Z]Jenis Berkas: Tak dikenali - Versi HTML
...P.B. `A Gilbertese Song' Journal of the Polynesian Society, 62:4 (1953), ...... C.D. `After Pepera: "free choice" - in three acts' New Guinea ...
ftp://coombs.anu.edu.au/coombspapers/subj-bibl-clearinghouse/pac-jnl-bibl.txt.Z - Halaman sejenis |
AMP- FRONT- PEPERA- PB AMP- FRONT- PEPERA- PB Intervenciones: 3; HI.... GOVERNMENT OF NKRI & TNI-POLRI DON'T BE CREASY CAUSE OF WEST PAPUA ...co.dada.net/ampunyanews/ - 55k - Tembolok - Halaman sejenis |
Papua Merdeka Front Persatuan Perjuangan Rakyat Papua Barat Konsulat Indonesia ( FrontPEPERA PB.K.I) mengadakan aksi long march di depan kampus Fakultas ...actadigital.blogspot.com/2007/12/aksi-damai-papua-merdeka.html - 79k - Tembolok - Halaman sejenis |
AMP- FRONT- PEPERA- PB AMP- FRONT- PEPERA- PB Posts: 3; HI.... GOVERNMENT OF NKRI & TNI-POLRI DON'T BE CREASY CAUSE OF WEST PAPUA (actualizado o dia 31 Janeiro) ...pt.dada.net/ampunyanews/ - 57k - Tembolok - Halaman sejenis |
West Monroe- P. B.. Mangum,. Prin. HS. MAINE. (See. Additional List. Below). Ashland-Kenneth L. Fish,. Prin. Comm. HS ...... 611 N. Front. St. Marshall-E. ...bul.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/39/208/91.pdf - Halaman sejenis |
... pazder pazsan pazur pazuzu pazzani pb pb1 pb2 pb\2esac pba pbaatech pbac .... pep21 pepa pepe pepe_ltd peper pepera peperone pepers pepet pephost pepi ...www.theargon.com/achilles/wordlists/net.txt - Halaman sejenis |
bodipost wrote 2 months ago : Front Pepera PB Jogyakarta, FrontPeperaPB – Puluhan Masyarakat dan Mahasiswa Papua di Jogyakarta … more ». Tag: AKSI MASSA ...id.wordpress.com/tag/jogyakarta/ - 10k - Tembolok - Halaman sejenis |
PEPERA pun akhirnya tidak diijinkan oleh Indonesia dan Amerika untuk memilih sesuai ....Front PEPERA PB Dalam Aksi · HUT OPM dan Momentum Harkitna Papua! ...papuandiary.blogspot.com/2007/07/akar-masalah-papua-tinjauan-historis.html - 90k - Tembolok - Halaman sejenis |
AMP- FRONT- PEPERA- PB AMP- FRONT- PEPERA- PB Intervenţii: 3; HI.... GOVERNMENT OF NKRI & TNI-POLRI DON'T BE CREASY CAUSE OF WEST PAPUA ...ro.dada.net/profile/rJaNywLScw3gouL2FInl2COXuI/ampjogya/ - 55k - Tembolok - Halaman sejenis |
dalam Parlemen Jalanan dan Front Pepera PB Kota Jayapura, berakhir dengan bentrokan berdarah, menyebabkan 3 orang anggota Brimob dan 1 intelijen ...khaledpunya.blogspot.com/2008/05/penjajahan-ala-freeport.html - 117k - Tembolok - Halaman sejenis |
AMP- FRONT- PEPERA- PB AMP- FRONT- PEPERA- PB Einträge: 3; HI.... GOVERNMENT OF NKRI & TNI-POLRI DON'T BE CREASY CAUSE OF WEST PAPUA (aktualisiert am 31 Januar) ...at.dada.net/profile/rJaNywLScw3gouL2FInl2COXuI/ampjogya/ - 56k - Tembolok - Halaman sejenis |
AMP- FRONT- PEPERA- PB AMP- FRONT- PEPERA- PB Interventions: 3; HI.... GOVERNMENT OF NKRI & TNI-POLRI DON'T BE CREASY CAUSE OF WEST PAPUA ...fr.dada.net/profile/rJaNywLScw3gouL2FInl2COXuI/ampjogya/ - 66k - Tembolok - Halaman sejenis |
... Malari, Front Aksi Mahasiswa Indonesia (FAMI) dan aksi gerakan penurunan Soeharto .....Front PEPERA PB ( Front Perjuangan Pembebasan Rakyat Papua Barat) ...mimbardemokrasi.blogspot.com/2007_10_01_archive.html - 114k - Tembolok - Halaman sejenis |
It has been alleged the Santeria cult and its Miami front man, Jose Luis Gil, .... 10 Hits - Luisito Rey. * Algo de Mí - Camilo Sesto. pb...ca.wordpress.com/tag/julio-iglesias/feed/ - 73k - Tembolok - Halaman sejenis |
This time, the chairman of the Front PEPERA PB of the Indonesian Consulate, Victor F. Yeimo, in Nabire, West Papua. Indonesia intelligence entered the room ...media-milis.blogspot.com/ - 331k - Tembolok - Halaman sejenis |
DEMO Aksinya Front Pepera Pb 01-mei 2008 DEMO Aksinya Front Pepera Pb 01-mei 2008 · » View all · My Video. To see the changes made please refresh the page. ...se.dada.net/profile/riaNyR6cRKWUCoE2FInl2COXuI/edowaydo/ - 73k - Tembolok - Halaman sejenis |
Kronologis Demo Front Pepera- PB Bali · Bendera Bintang Kejora Dikibarkan dalam Upacara · ORGANISASI PAPUA MERDEKA · Masa Peralihan Kekuasaan ...kamasanpost.blogspot.com/2008_01_01_archive.html - 24k - Tembolok - Halaman sejenis |
AMP- FRONT- PEPERA- PB AMP- FRONT- PEPERA- PB Posts: 3; HI.... GOVERNMENT OF NKRI & TNI-POLRI DON'T BE CREASY CAUSE OF WEST PAPUA (diperbaharui di 31 Januari) ...id.life.dada.net/profile/rJaNywLScw3gouL2FInl2COXuI/ampjogya/ - 55k - Tembolok - Halaman sejenis |
[688] PB [689] PB&J Otter - Die Rasselbande vom Hoohaw-See [690] PB&J Otter – Die Rasselbande ...... [20466] People's Front for the Liberation of Palestine ...wikipedia.tol.pro.br/portal/artigo-de/procurar_P - Halaman sejenis |
[PDF]Jenis Berkas: PDF/Adobe Acrobat
PB [Pengurus Besar] 理事会，中央執行委員会． PDIP [Partai Demokrasi Indonesia ...Pepera [Penentuan Pendapat Rakyat] 民意決定. （1969 年，インドネシア共和国 ...
wwwstd.ryu.titech.ac.jp/~indonesia/tokodai/dokumen/kamusjpina.pdf - Halaman sejenis |
Staniewicz-Brudnik, B.; Majewska-Albin, K.; Kłaput, E.; Pepera, P.; Procyk, ...... Stareńczak, P.B. Drugi rejestr ratunkiem dla polskiej floty? ...baztech.icm.edu.pl/baztech/cgi-bin/btdoc_f_pl.cgi - Halaman sejenis |
AMP- FRONT- PEPERA- PB AMP- FRONT- PEPERA- PB Posts: 3; HI.... GOVERNMENT OF NKRI & TNI-POLRI DON'T BE CREASY CAUSE OF WEST PAPUA (atualizado o dia 31 Janeiro) ...br.dada.net/profile/rJaNywLScw3gouL2FInl2COXuI/ampjogya/ - 65k - Tembolok - Halaman sejenis |
... terancam keselamatannya akibat diburu aparat keamanan," kata Juru Bicara Front Persatuan Perjuangan Rakyat Papua Barat ( Front PEPERA- PB), Arkilaus Baho, ...www.tempointeraktif.com/hg/nasional/2006/03/25/brk,20060325-75537,id.html - 45k - Tembolok - Halaman sejenis |
... jumpa pers di gedung Pengurus Besar Nahdlatul Ulama ( PB NU) di Jalan Kramat Raya, ...Front Perjuangan Pembebasan Rakyat Papua Barat ( Front PEPERA PB), ...teguhtimur.com/2007/09/page/2/ - 55k - Tembolok - Halaman sejenis |
Demonstrasi Berpita Bintang Kejora: Front PEPERA- PB Desak Belanda, AS Dan PBB Gelar Referendum Untuk Papua (judul asli), sebaiknya menjadi: DEMONSTRASI ...malioboroman.multiply.com/journal/item/37 - 24k - Tembolok - Halaman sejenis |
Hadiri Rapat Umum Front Perjuangan Rakyat Menuntut Pembatalan Kenaikan Harga BBM ...Front Perjuangan Pembebasan Rakyat Papua Barat ( Front PEPERA PB); ...sarekathijauindonesia.org/?q=id/content/komnas-ham-segera-bentuk-tim-penyelidikan- - 21k - Tembolok - Halaman sejenis |
Front Pepera PB Tolak PP No. 77. 2 April, 2008. Front Pepera PB. Jogyakarta, FrontPeperaPB – Puluhan Masyarakat dan Mahasiswa Papua di Jogyakarta yang ...digoel.wordpress.com/ - 44k - Tembolok - 설명 0 개 | | | 177 개의 보기 | | | 전체 기사 보기 |
|
|
| | | 게시자: 2008 5월 10 00:16 의 Deleted member |
http://www.freewestpapua.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=656&Itemid=2 WEST PAPUA: 45th anniversary of Indonesian occupation marked in West Papua, UK, Netherlands & Indone Free West Papua Campaign, Oxford, UK www.freewestpapua.org 5 May 2008 For 45 years Indonesia has tried to SILENCE West Papua’s CRY for FREEDOM. But on 1 May 2008, despite threats, tricks and intimidation by the Indonesian military and Police, thousands of West Papuans bravely spoke out, supported in solidarity by many international friends. In Wamena, Nabire, Jayapura, Manokwari, Sorong, Biak, Jogjakarta, Jakarta, London & the Hague, the same message was loud & clear: “We are West Papuans! We don’t want to be Indonesian. We just want to be FREE!” Reports received by Benny Wenda, Chairman, Koteka Tribal Assembly and leader of the West Papuan independence movement in the UK. *********************************** WAMENA, West Papua: Message from Wamena: “On 1May 2008, the Indonesian military tried to stop any Papuans in Wamena from coming out to mark the 45 anniversary of the occupation. TNI organised a celebration of “integration of West Papua into Indonesia”. They lied to us that UN were coming to visit us in Wamena so we would come out and then Indonesia could say we Papuans are happy to be ruled by Indonesia. But no Papuans went to the Indonesian celebration. Instead, thousands of us came from all villages into Wamena for peaceful protest against Indonesian occupation of our Land. Today is the day of Indonesia Illegal Occupation of West Papua 1963 and the start of killing, rape, torturing, imprisonment and intimidation. Until today we never free so we want to live free in our own Land. We need U.K Government to help us to have New Referendum in West Papua.”
For PHOTOS, see: http://www.freewestpapua.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=646&Itemid=2 ****************************************** NABIRE, West Papua: Message from Nabire, 1 May 2008 “We need Referendum. We need Freedom. We need to be free from Indonesia in our own Land. We don’t want to live under Indonesia rule because they kill us from 1963 until today.” For full message in Malay, see: http://www.infopapua.org/artman/publish/article_1740.shtml *************************************************** JAYAPURA, West Papua: On 1 May 2008, the Morning Star flag was raised in front of the local government office Jayapura, Abepura (Waena).
 
Indonesian Police are now searching for the person who raised the flag For full message in Malay, see: http://www.kabarpapua.com/online/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1085 ********************************************** MANOKWARI, West Papua: 1 May 2008, Manokwari People in Manokwari were preparing for mass protest on 1 May but the Police stopped them and two Papuan women got arrested by Police. Until today we do not know if they have been released. This is a report from Papuan students in Jogjakarta. On 1 May, Indonesian military in Manokwari forced DAP [Papuan Tribal Council] to recognise the Indonesia flag. Military themself raised the Indonesia flag in front of the DAP office. Number of the DAP members were not happy with military action. DAP had negotiations on 25 April with the TNI in Manokwari itself. “We [DAP] said we not allow raising of Indonesian flag or West Papua flag in our office. We just want without any of the flag in our office. But TNI forced us to have Indonesia flag on 1 May.” For full message in Malay, see: http://www.kabarpapua.com/online/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1089 ******************************************** SORONG, West Papua: 1 May 2008 Message from DAP [Papuan Tribal Council] Sorong DAP Sorong reported to Papuan students in Jogjakarta that Governor Abraham Atoruri of West Irian Jaya Province forced the DAP and elders to sign a statement on 1 May about West Papua joining Indonesia. But DAP refused to sign the statement and they are asking the international community to put pressure to Indonesia government not intimidate us into signing this statement. **************************************************** BIAK, West Papua: 1 May 2008 Message from Biak “We need new Referendum and we refuse Indonesia illegal occupation in our country West Papua.” For full message in Malay, see: JOGJAKARTA, Java, Indonesia: 1 May 2008 Message from West Papuan students in Jogjakarta to Indonesia Government and to the world and especially to the people of U.K. “Give us West Papuans our political rights we were promised on 1 December 1961. Indonesia, Netherlands and U.S. are responsible for the repressive action and manipulation about in the way Indonesia annexed West Papua Land. Stop putting pressure on Papuans to accept Special Autonomy and the split of West Papua into more provinces. Now the Indonesia Government is head of the UN decolonisation committee. We urge you to bring West Papua matter onto the Agenda.” Update (5 May 2008): Since the flag raising on 1 May, Indonesian intelligence have threatened and intimidated the Papuan students in Jogjakarta. At the moment, the students are not leaving their dormitories.
Sign says: “We are remembering 45 years imprisonment and annexation of West Papua by colonialism of NKRI (Republic of Indonesia)” For PHOTOS, see: http://www.freewestpapua.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=648&Itemid=2 ******************************************** JAKARTA, Java, Indonesia: Message from Papuan students in Jakarta 1 May 2008 “Today we all West Papuan are remembering this terrible day and what happened to our elders, children, woman and our parents who were killed by Indonesian military because of this day.”
The students delivered a copy of Benny Wenda’s message to the Dutch Embassy in Jakarta. For PHOTOS, see: http://www.freewestpapua.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=647&Itemid=2 ***************************************************** BALI, Indonesia Message from Papuan student in Bali to U.K Government “Today 1 May 2008 we got arrested by Indonesia Police but we know U.K government and People of U.K. support us. [Four Papuans were arrested, but all have now been released.] We know people in Australia, Pacific, Vanuatu, U.S.A. and Europe support us so we will carry on Peaceful Demonstrations until we get Freedom.” The Papuan students delivered a copy of Benny Wenda’s message to the US Consulate in Bali.  Front Pepera Bali
For Indonesian TV News report of the 1 May protest in Bali, see: http://www.liputan6.com/daerah/?id=158774 For full message in Malay, see: http://www.freewestpapua.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=655&Itemid=2 ******************************************** LONDON, United Kingdom Free West Papua Campaign (UK) 1 May 2008: Benny Wenda delivers Petition to UK Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, at 10, Downing Street, London, together with Lord Harries Lord Hylton, Maria Wenda & Richard Samuelson
Several other MPs and Members of the House of Lords said they were sorry that they could not help deliver the Petition this time (1 May was Local Election day in England & Wales), including Andrew Smith MP (Chairman of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on West Papua), Jeremy Corbyn MP, John Battle MP, Mike Hancock MP, Baroness Cox, Lord Griffiths and Lord Kilclooney. For PHOTOS, see: http://www.freewestpapua.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=649&Itemid=2 For Benny Wenda’s Petition to the UK Prime Minister, Gordon Brown (in English), see: http://www.freewestpapua.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=645&Itemid=2 For Benny Wenda’s Petition to the UK Prime Minister, Gordon Brown (in Malay), see: http://www.infopapua.org/artman/publish/article_1741.shtml For FWPC(UK) 1 May 2008 statement on Youtube, see: http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=UTQUFElHbhk 1 May 2008: Free West Papua (UK) demo outside the Indonesian Embassy, London For PHOTOS, see: http://www.freewestpapua.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=650&Itemid=2 THE HAGUE, Netherlands: 1 May message from the Motherland [Netherlands] Free West Papua (NL) demo outside the Dutch Parliament For PHOTOS, see: BACROUND
Understanding the Papuans’ call for referendum
By Neles Tebay, Abepura, Papua
Mar 20, 2008, 22:41
|
|
The Indigenous Papuans have begun calling for referendum to decide the future political status of Papua province. The call was raised by the Papuan youth. I do think that the same call will be raised in days and months to come.
There are two major factors that trigger the Papuans to call for refendum.
Firstly, the call for referendum is raised due to the government’s failure in implementing properly and consistently the Law no.21/2001 on the Special Autonomy for Papua Province.
The Papuans know that their problems have already been accomodated in the Papuan autonomy law. Therefore they have been calling upon the government to address their grievances through an effecitve implementation of the law.
However, they see that the government has no moral commitment to put the law into practice. It has even no willingness to enforce the law consistently.
Instead, the government has deliberately produced some policies conflicting against the Papuan autonomy law, after having deliberately postponed for four years to issue the government regulation on the formation of the Papuan People’s Assembly (MRP).
One example is that the central government establishes a new province of West Papua, although by violating the Papuan autonomy law, and imposes upon the Papuans to accept the existence o f the Province .
The government under the leadership of President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono has not issued all necessary government regulations (peraturan Pemerintah), except one on the formation of the MRP, and therefore some articles of the autonomy law can’t be executed in Papua.
Instead, President Yudhoyono has decided to issue new controversial government regulation to accomodate the presence of the West Papua Province.
The regulation on West Papua will make the autonomy law more difficult to be implemented. How can the autonomy law for Papua Province be implemented also in other province?
The House of Representative, on its part, has not considered the implementation of the autonomy law as a solution to address the Papuans’ grievances.Therefore the house never encourges the government to produce necessary government regulations and to do monitoring the Papuan provincial government’s role in implementing the law.
Ignoring the necessity of implementing the autonomy law, the House agreed to form some four new provinces in Papua, namely West Papua, South West Papua, Central Papua, and South Papua.
The Papuan provincial government also never produces the special implementing regulations (Peraturan Daerah Khusus/Perdasus) and provicial regulations (Peraturan daerah Provinsi/Perdasi) which are necessary for implementing properly the autonomy law.
The present governor has even not yet approved the special implementing regulation (Perdasus) on how to spend properly the autonomy fund. As a result, the use of autonomy funds is completedy up to the individual governor and the regents and it can’t be monitored by the people for not having legally approved criteria. Therefore, much of autonomy fund are allegedly misused by the government officials.
The Provincial legislative council (DPRP) still needs to be encouraged to prioritize the implementation of the autonomy law.
So in the eyes of the Papuans, the central government, the House of Representative, the Papuan provincial government and legislative council, all of them fail to implement the autonomy law.
As a result, the Indigenous Papuans’ prosperity is not improved yet. In February of this year, Papuan governor Barnabas Suebu announced that some 80 percents of the total population in Papua province were identified living under poverty line.
It means that the implementation of the law for seven years has never brought about any change in terms of the living standart of the Papuans.
The Papuans have repeatedly called for a comprehesive evaluation on the implementation of the autonomy law by involving the all Papuans in the whole process of the evaluation. The evaluation is meant to jointly identify the obstacles to the enforcement of the law and seek the solutions to remove the obstacles so that the law can be executed properly.
The government never responds to the call for evaluation, however. It means that the government wants to keep repeating the errors it has been committing for seven years.
So, the Papuans already come to the conclusion that the government does not want to implement the autonomy law, properly and consistently, despite its repeated empty promises.
Secondly, the central government has not demonstrated its willingness to engage in peaceful dialogue to settle the Papua case.
The call for dialogue has repeatedly been raised since 2000 by the Papuans and supported all civilian society’s elements in Papua, including the Papuan rebels in the jungle.
However, Jakarta is not interested in the proposed dialogue. It means the government prefers violent approach to settle the Papua case. Perhaps, it is the reason why the central government increases number of troops in Papua.
New military commands are establsihed in newly formed regencies. New military posts are set up along the land border with the Papua New Guinea. New Batalyons are formed. All batalyons are added with more troops. Thousands of troops will be deployed in the future. All these make Papua as the Indonesian military occupied territory.
So the call for refendum is raised due to the government’s failures to implement the autonomy law and its refusal to have dialogue with the Papuans while increasing the number of troops in Papua.
The writer is a lecturer at the Fajar Timur School of Philosophy and Theology in Abepura, Papua.
http://www.infopapua.org/artman/publish/article_1686.shtml
© Copyright by w@tchPAPUA | |
|
| | | 게시자: 2008 5월 10 00:00 의 Deleted member |
FREE WEST PAPUA CAMPAIGN
www.freewestpapua.org
P.O. Box 656, Oxford, OX3 3AP England, U.K.Tel: +44(0)7766 875009
office@freewestpapua.org
1 Mei 2008
Rt Hon. Gordon Brown MP,
PRIME MINISTER,
10, Downing Street,
LONDON SW1A 2AA
Bapak Perdana Menteri Yang Terhormat,
Saya berada disini di rumah mu di Downing Street hari ini dengan membawa salam dari rakyat Papua Barat kepada anda dan rakyat Kerajaan Inggris Raya.
Hari ini adalah hari sangat sedih bagi rakyat saya, hari ini 45 tahun yang lalu, Indonesia menjajah tanah air kami tercinta &65533; PAPUA BARAT.
Banyak tetesan air mata rakyat saya akan bercucuran hari ini. Itulah mengapa saya berada di sini. Saya membawa bersama saya ke depan pintu rumah anda, tulang- belulang dari ribuan rakyat Papua Barat yang dibunuh oleh Indonesia. Mereka mulai membunuh kami mulai sejak hari pertama menyerbu tanah kami pada tanggal 1 Mei 1963 � dan mereka masih membunuh, menganiaya, memperkosa, mengintimidasi dan memenjarakan kami sampai hari ini. Indonesia tidak pernah peduli terhadap kami sebagai sesama manusia. Mereka hanya menginginkan emas, tembaga, gas dan pohon-pohon kami.
Selama 45 tahun kami telah menangis untuk KEMERDEKAAN kami, tetapi tidak seorangpun mendengarkan kami.
Tetapi hari ini kami bangsa Papua Barat juga memiliki PENGHARAPAN bahwa suatu hari kami akan MERDEKA! Oleh karena itu saya mau mengucapkan TERIMA KASIH kepada seluruh rakyat Kerajaan Inggris Raya yang pada saat ini memberikan dukungan sangat kuat, serta rasa solidaritas, hormat dan cinta kasih terhadap rakyat saya. Bapak Perdana Menteri, ketika saya melakukan perjalanan keliling negara anda, saya mendapatkan bahwa rakyat anda memiliki hati yang sangat baik. Keadilan dan kejujuran adalah nilai-nilai yang sangat penting bagi rakyat Inggris. Jadi ketika mereka mendengar apa yang Indonesia lakukan terhadap rakyat saya, pertanyaan utama mereka adalah �Apa yang dapat saya lakukan untuk menolong anda?� Dari Aberdeen sampai ke Exeter, Liverpool sampai ke Norwich, Aberstwyth sampai ke Guernsey (Saya tidak dapat menyebutkan semua tempat-tempat yang telah kami kunjungi satu per satu), di Amnesti Internasional, gereja-gereja, universitas-universitas, Trade Unions, partai-partai politik, kelompok-kelompok pencinta lingkungan hidup dan di kampung kami sendiri di Oxford, kami telah bertemu beberapa dari orang-orang terbaik di dunia. Anda harus merasa sangat bangga menjadi pemimpin mereka.
Dan di parlemen Inggris, Papua Barat juga memiliki sahabat-sahabat sangat baik , khususnya Andrew Smith dan Lord Harries. Kami rakyat Papua Barat selalu berdoa bagi mereka dan berterima kasih kepada Tuhan karena mereka berbicara dengan sangat kuat dari hati mereka yang dalam demi keadilan bagi rakyat saya. Disini di Inggris mereka bebas untuk mengatakan bahwa pemerintah salah. Sekarang saya belajar apa arti demokrasi yang sesungguhnya.
Ketika saya memberitahu rakyat saya di tanah air tentang dukungan yang sekarang kami miliki di Inggirs, itu memberikan mereka kekuatan untuk terus berjuang.
Jadi sekarang saya mau memberitahu anda, Bapak Perdana Menteri, satu hal yang sedang membingung kansaya. Saya mendengar anda berbicara sangat tegas di Televisi tentang Burma dan Zimbabwe dan anda mengatakan dalam pidato anda bahwa �tidak ada ketidak adilan yang akan berlangsung selama-lamanya� tetapi mengapa anda dan menteri-menteri anda tidak mengatakan hal yang sama tentang apa yang terjadi di Papua Barat?
Menteri Luar Negeri anda, David Miliband mengatakan bahwa Indonesia sekarang adalah sebuah negara demokrasi. Mungkin mereka memiliki demokrasi di Jakarta, tetapi rakyat kami tidak bebas untuk berkampanye secara demokratis untuk penentuan nasib sendiri. Jika kami rakyat Papua Barat dapat memiliki sebuah �Partai Papua Merdeka�, seperti partai Plaid Cymru atau partai Scottish National anda, dan berbicara dengan bebas serta mengibarkan bendera kemerdekaan kami tanpa dipenjarakan � itu baru namanya kami hidup dalam sebuah demokrasi.
Mentri anda, Meg Munn mengatakan bahwa apa yang Indonesia lakukan di Papua Barat adalah �sebuah model untuk dunia�. Apakah yang dia maksudkan adalah bahwa negara �negara lain harus membunuh, memperkosa dan menganiaya seperti yang Indonesia lakukan? Dan Meg Munn juga masih mengatakan bahwa kami rakyat Papua Barat �memilih untuk bergabung dengan Indonesia pada Act of No Choice tahun 1969. Kami mau bertanya apakah sebuah pemilihan umum di Inggris akan dinyatakan sah secara hukum bila tentara-tentara Inggris mengelilingi ribuan orang dan memaksa merekan dibawah tekanan senjata untuk memilih partai neo-Nazi British National?
Dan menteri anda, Lord Malloch-Brown mengatakan bahwa pelanggaran-pelanggaran hak-hak asasi manusia yang diderita oleh rakyat saya �hanya relatif sedikit saja�.
Menteri-menteri anda selalu berusaha memberitahu dunia bahwa berbagai hal sekarang lebih baik bagi rakyat saya. Ini tidak benar. Mengapa menteri-menteri anda berusaha memaafkan apa yang Indonesia lakukan terhadap rakyat saya. Penganiayaan, pemerkosaan dan pembunuhan adalah salah dimana saja hal-hal itu terjadi � di Burma, Zimbabwe dan di Papua Barat?
Ketika saya memberitahu rakyat saya di tanah air apa yang menteri-menteri Inggris katakan tentang Papua Barat, saya harus memberitahu anda bahwa hal ini sangat melukai hati mereka. Ini sangat menyakitkan bagi rakyat Papua Barat untuk mendengarkan kata-kata ini dari London ketika rakyat saya menangis didalam penjara (15 tahun dipenjara karena mengibarkan sebuah bendera). Ini sangat melukai bagi mereka untuk mendengarkan kata-kata tersebut ketika rakyat saya bersembunyi di hutan-hutan dari kejaran aparat militer Indonesia atau mereka menangis di kuburan bagi kekasih-kekasih mereka yang ditembak mati serdadu-serdadu Indonesia.
Jadi hari ini adalah 45 tahun sejak Indonesia menjajah Papuan Barat. Kami tidak mau berada di sini di London dalam waktu sampai 5 tahun lagi untuk ulang tahunnya yang ke 50. Saya ingin kembali ke tanah air saya untuk berada bersama-sama rakyat saya, tidak hidup lagi dalam ketakutan, tetapi bebas untuk menjadi manusia normal yang biasa, bermain-main bersama anak-anak kami, mendengarkan cerita-cerita dari orang-orang tua kami, menyanyikan lagu-lagu kami dan menari tari-tarian kami, pergi ke kebun untuk menanam sayur-sayuran dan ke hutan untuk berburu babi. Dan mungkin anak-anak kami akan bertumbuh menjadi dokter atau guru, atau mungkin mereka memilih untuk menjalani kehidupan yang sederhana di kampung sama seperti yang nenek moyang-nenek moyang kami lakukan. Ini adalah mimpi rakyat Papua Barat. Apakah ini terlalu banyak untuk diminta?
Kami rakyat Papua Barat tidak akan pernah bebas tanpa bantuan dari orang-orang baik seluruh dunia. Bapak Perdana Menteri, kami memerlukan Kerajaan Inggris Raya untuk menjadi suara kami.
Tuhan memberkati anda dan para menteri anda.
Salam hormat,
Benny Wenda
Pemimpin Papua Merdeka di Kerajaan Inggris
dan Ketua DEMMAK, Dewan Musyawarah Masyarakat Adat Koteka
© Copyright by w@tchPAPUA
MENOLAK PAPUA BERINTEGRASI KEDALAM NEGARA KESATUAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA 1 MEI 1963 DAN MEMINTA SEGERA REVERENDUM ULANG PAPUA
Bangsa Papua mendiami di Tanah Papua serta Masyarakat bangsa papua barat hidup dari hasil ciptaan Tuhan yang diberkati Tuhan sampai Tanggal 1 Desenber 1961 telah memproklamirkan diri dari tangan Pemeintah Hidia belanda.
Meskipun demikian Pemerintah Amerika Serikat mengangkat dirinya sebagai polisi Dunia/ Alat pengamanan Dunia, sehingga merasa bertanggung jawab untuk mengatur Dunia.
Karena Amerika serikat takut benua Australia dan Laut Pasifik dipengaruhi oleh Aliran Komunisme Rusia/ RRC, maka Pemerintah Amerika Serikat memerintahkan Pemerintah Belanda untuk menyerahkan Tanah dan Bangsa papua Barat pada Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. Agar penyerahan Tanah dan Bangsa papua barat ini kelihatannya lebih beradab dan lebih professional, maka Amerika Serikat memperalat PBB untuk membuat suatu Perjanjian. Maka lahirlah NEWYORK AGREEMENT.
Berdasarkan Perjanjian newyork pemerintah belanda menyerahkan Tanah dan bangsa papua kepada UNTEA pada tanggal 1 oktober 1962.
Setelah satu tahun tepat tanggal 1 MEI 1963 Tanah dan Bangsa Papua Barat diserahkan sepenuhnya kepada Pemerintah Republik Indonesia.untuk dijajah, dibunuh, diperkosa dan kemudian dimusnahkan rakyatnya dan dirampok Kekayaan Alamnya. Proses Penyerahan Tanah dan Bangsa Papua Barat secara ILEGAL POLITIK INTERNASIONAL tanpa keterlibatan Pemerintah bangsa papua Barat yang diproklamirkan pada tanggal 1 desember 1961 di port Numbay/ Jayapura .
Hal jelas CACAT HUKUM INTERNASIONAL yang sengaja dilakukan oleh Pemerintah Amerikat Serikat, Pemerintah Belanda , PBB, dan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia demi berpihak kepada kepentingan PENGUASAAN DAN PERAMPASAN KEKAYAAN ALAM PAPUA SAJA bukan berpihak kepada kepentingan Rakyat bangsa papua Barat.
Tujuan proses Penyerahan Tanah dan bangsa papua Barat ketangan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia yang dilakukan oleh Pemerintah Amerika serikat, PBB, Pemerintah Belanda dan Pemerintah Indonesia maka mulai Pemerintah Indonesia langsung menerapkan tindakan kekerasan terhadap Rakyat bangsa papua Barat di mulai dari tanggal 1 mei 1963 diatas tanah Papua dengan cara :
1.Memulai pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia atau mulai penumpahan Darah Tokoh-tokoh Politik Papua, Masyarakat Bangsa Papua Barat yang tidak menerima Bendera Merah Putih, Masyarakat yang tetap pro kepada Bangsa papua barat , Tokoh-tokoh Intwelektual, Mahasiswa, pelajar, Tokoh-tokoh wanita papua,Masyarakat pedesaan, Tokoh-tokoh agama, Aktivis ELSM bahkan Pegawai pemerintah RI juga ikut terbantai oleh TNI/ POLRI diseluruh Tanah Papua,
2.Mulai memberlakukan STATUS Daerah Operasi Militer/ DOM diseluruh tanah papua,
3.Mulai membatasi / memenjarakan perkembangan politik Bangsa Papua barat dibawah kuasa MILITERISASI PAPUA,
4.Mulai mencuri dan merampas Kekayaan alam papua secara ILEGAL dibawah TODONGAN SENJATA,
5.Mulai menguasai Objek Vital ekonomi Rakyat Papua dibawah Intervensi TNI/ POLRI diseluruh Tanah Papua,
6.Mulai membatasi dan membelokkan Kwalitas pendidikan yang bermutu dari 3 / tiga Yayasan besar Papua kepada sekolah-sekolah Negeri dan sekolah Inpres diseluruh Tanah papua menjadi Sentralisasi,
7.Mulai alihkan Obat-obat bantuan dari Badan kesehatan Dunia/ WHO dialihkan ke dokter-dokter Praktek dengan biaya yang sangat mahal kepada Rakyat papua dianggap miskin untuk hanya kepentingan uang saja, menyebabkan kematian orang papua sangat besar diseluruh tanah papua,
8.Mulai menerapkan Program KELUARGA BERENCANA kepada masyarakat Papua secara sistematis yang rapi sehingga angaka kelahiran orang papua lebih rendah dari pada angka kematian orang papua lebih tinggi diseluruh tanah papua.
Berdasarkan Permasalahan diatas maka Kami Masyarakat Bangsa Papua Barat Kabupaten Nabire MEMINTA TEGAS Kepada Pemerintah Amerika serikat, Periserikatan Bangsa-bangsa (PBB), Pemerintah Belanda dan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia harus bertanggung Jawab atas CACAT HUKUM INTERNASIONAL dengan sengaja dibuat terhadap Masyarakat Bangsa Papua Barat. Untuk itu Kami Rakyat Bangsa Papua Barat menuntut dengan tegas kepada Pemerintah Amerika serikat, PBB, Pemerintah Belanda , Pemerintah Republik Indonesia dan Dunia Internasional segera bertanggung jawab penuh Proses REVERENDUM ULANG Kepada Rakyat Bangsa Papua Barat dibawah Pengawasan Perserikatan Bangsa-bangsa( PBB).
Bangsa Papua Kabupaten Nabire Sedang mengadakan Jumpa Pess
Dan sedang membacakan pernyataan sikap Pada tanggal 1 Mei 1963 sebagai Hari Anekisasi Papua Kedalan NKRI Secara Paksa,
Sedang Membacakan Pernyataan Sikap.
Poster yang terpampan di depan ruang yang mengadakan jumpa Pess
Penjelasan : Berkaitan dengan Jumpa pess ini kami undang seluruh Wartawan Yang ada di Nabire Namun mereka tidak datang karena mereka dilarang
oleh Pihak Aparat TNI/POLRI .
Yang Mengadakan Jumpa Pess
1. Pdt Daud Auwe M. Div dari Intektual papua.
2. Pdt Esebius Pigai Sth dari Perwakilan Tokoh agama.
3. Yones Douw dari Perwakilan HAM.
4. Mikhael Zonggenau Amd,Sp.
5. B.R Edowai SPD dari Dewan Adat Papua
6. Demianus Douw S.Sos Ag perwakilan Dari PNS
7. Petrus Boma Perwakilan dari TPN PB
8. Yohanes Agapa Perwakilan Dari Satgas Papua,
© Copyright by w@tchPAPUA
WEST PAPUA: Letter from Councillor Matt Sellwood, Oxford City Council (Green Party) to UK Foreign Secretary, David Miliband MP
Oxford, 27 March 2008
Dear Foreign Secretary,
I wanted to write to you, briefly, to express my anger and dismay at the appeasement of Indonesia by your department, particularly by Under Secretary Meg Munn in her speech at Wilton Park on March 3rd.
In the speech, Ms Munn expressed the view that the way in which Indonesia is dealing with West Papua could be used as 'an example for the world'. I am curious as to which parts of the beatings, torture, extra-judicial imprisonments and supression of freedom of expression Ms Munn was referring to.
I am a member of an elected body, Oxford City Council, that proudly flies the West Papuan flag each year in solidarity with those in West Papua who cannot do so - and are beaten and tortured for trying.
Perhaps Ms Munn would like to come and visit Oxford, and meet the West Papuans who live here. She would certainly get a different picture of the situation than she clearly does from her cozy chats with the Indonesian Foreign Minister.
Yours,
Matt Sellwood
--
Cllr Matt Sellwood
Holywell Ward
Oxford City Council
Richard Samuelson
Free West Papua Campaign, Oxford, UK.
www.freewestpapua.org
© Copyright by w@tchPAPUA
http://www.infopapua.org/artman/publish/article_1687.shtml
TAPOL, the Indonesia Human Rights Campaign
20 March 2008
STATEMENT ON CRACKDOWN IN WEST PAPUA AGAINST
FLAG-RAISERS
According to latest reports from West Papua, more than
a dozen Papuans have been arrested for taking part in peacefully unfurling their flag, the Morning Star (Kejora), some or all of whom are likely to be charged for
rebellion (makar). The arrests were made following a
series of protest demonstrations in Manokwari and Jayapura against Presidential Decree PP77 which makes it illegal to unfurl regional flags not only in West Papua but
in other parts of the country as well.
The peaceful demonstration on 13 March in Manokwari
was organised by the
West Papua National Authority (WPNA) and the Greater
Manokwari Student
Executive Council (Badan Eksekutif Mahasiswa, BEM).
Following the enactment of the Decree, eleven Papuans
were arrested in
Manokwari on 13 March for flying the kejora in protest
against the Decree.
More arrests were reported on 19 March when the police
took four people
into custody in Jayapura for raising flags and for
disturbing security.
According to a report in the Jayapura newspaper,
Cenderawasih Pos on 16
March, the regional police chief of Papua,
Inspector-General Max Donald,
said that the police would be taking action against
those who unfurled the
kejora flag in Manokwari and elsewhere.
The eleven persons arrested in Manokwari are:
Jack Wanggai, spokesperson of the West Papua National
Authority,
Frans Kareth, lecturer in economics,
Markus Solig Umpes,
Edy Ayorbaba,
Daniel Sakwatorey,
Marthinus Luther,
Noak AP
George Rasyard Ayorbaba,
Ariel Werimon,
Leonardus Decky Bame,
Silas Carlos Teves May, aged 16 years.
Yan Christian Warinussy, Executive Director of LP3BH,
the legal aid
organisation in Manokwari, announced on 14 March that
they have set up a
Team of Lawyers for Human Rights for the Papuan People
to defend the first
two persons named above who have been subjected to
intensive interrogation
by the police. In the case of Jack Wanggai, the
interrogation which was
accompanied by threats to kidnap members of his
family, focused on the
purposes of the WPNA and the reasons for organising
the demonstration on 13
March.
The four persons arrested by the police in Jayapura
are:
Zakarias Horota,
Elias Weah,
Ester Dolorus Tapnesa,
Abu Mari
They too have been charged with rebellion and with
disturbing security.
TAPOL strongly condemns these arrests and believes
that they represent a
grave infringement of the freedom of expression and
the right to engage in
peaceful protest.
TAPOL also condemns the enactment of presidential
decree PP77 which makes
it an offence to unfurl regional flags.
Carmel Budiardjo of TAPOL said: 'The enactment of PP77
which makes it an
offence to unfurl a flag can only trigger renewed
protest among Papuans.
This decree can further exacerbate the sense of
injustice that has swept
across West Papua since the beginning of the month.'
TAPOL calls for the lifting of charges of rebellion
that have been laid
against some of those arrested and calls for the
unconditional release of
all those now in police custody.
It also calls for the repeal of PP77 which is in
flagrant violation of the
right to engage in the peaceful action of raising a
regional flag.
END
TAPOL, the Indonesia Human Rights Campaign
111 Northwood Road, Thornton Heath, Croydon CR7 8HW,
UK.
tel +44 (0)20 8771 2904 fax +44 (0)20 8653 0322
tapol@gn.apc. org http://tapol. gn.apc.org
© Copyright by w@tchPAPUA
FREE WEST PAPUA CAMPAIGN (UK)
Oxford, 20th March 2008
-----------------------------------
Dear friends of West Papua,
GOOD NEWS! WEST PAPUAN VOICE IN U.K. MEDIA AT LAST!
ACTION: PLEASE E-MAIL/WRITE TO GUARDIAN EDITOR
---------------------------------------------------
As you may have already seen, an article on BP's highly controversial West Papua natural gas project was published in The Guardian newspaper here in the UK yesterday (19 March 2008).
The article, "Shattered illusions", copied below, was written by the Guardian's Environment Editor, John Vidal, using information sent to Benny Wenda from our sources inside West Papua.
It's incredibly dangerous for Papuans to speak out against BP like this inside West Papua. BP Tangguh is regarded by the Indonesian regime as a "national asset", so any Papuans who oppose the project are regarded as "enemies of the state". John Vidal's Guardian article is so important because it has allowed West Papuans directly affected by BP's Tangguh project to be heard by the outside World.
NOW WE NEED YOUR HELP ...
FWPC needs your help to get the voice of West Papua AS A WHOLE heard by the outside World, via the international media.
Please e-mail/write to the Editor of the Guardian (see how below):
1) THANKING the Guardian for John Vidal's crucially important article (Shatterd illusions, March 19) which will help bring WEST PAPUA out into the international spotlight. For most of the 45 year long history of Indonesia's bloody occupation, the outside World has tragically ignored the oppression of the indigenous West Papuan population by the Indonesian military, but now, at long last, John Vidal's article shows that things are beginning to change.
2) ASKING the Guardian to REPORT REGULARLY on the continuing suffering of the West Papuan people under Indonesian occupation and on the Papuans' peaceful struggle for self-determination. (You may like to mention that last week, on March 13, Indonesian police arrested nine people in Manokwari, West Papua, during a demonstration against a 2007 Indonesian law banning the display of "separatist symbols", including the West Papuan Morning Star Flag. One of the nine in custody is a 16-year-old boy. See yesterday's Human Rights Watch report "Free Peaceful Protesters in Papua", also copied below).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How do I send a letter to the Guardian?
You can email messages at letters@guardian.co.uk,
fax letters to 0207 837 4530,
or post them to: The Editor, The Guardian, 119 Farringdon Road, London EC1R 3ER.
We do not publish letters where only an email address is supplied; please include a full postal address and a reference to the relevant article. If you do not want your email address published, please say so. We may edit letters.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THANK YOU! This is a really important chance to show The Guardian (and the international media as a whole) that you care about what's happening now in West Papua.
Papua Merdeka!
Free West Papua!
Richard
Richard Samuelson
Free West Papua Campaign, Oxford, UK.
www.freewestpapua.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BP WEST PAPUA: Shattered illusions
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/mar/19/fossilfuels.indonesia
When BP set out to build a £3.5bn natural gas plant in remote West Papua, local villagers hoped for a bright future. But all is not well.
John Vidal
The Guardian,
Wednesday March 19 2008
Recently, with hundreds of Indonesian troops just out of sight in scenes of intense security, Prince Andrew, the government's official business envoy, dropped in on Bintuni Bay, one of Indonesia's mots remote corners. The plan was to inspect BP's new £3.5bn natural gas plant. What the Duke of York probably did not know was that he had walked straight into a row between the giant oil company and local villagers.
The British firm had promised its new neighbours, who live on the edge of the pristine Papuan rainforest, better homes, long-term jobs and full environmental protection when it started several years ago to build its giant plant to extract 14 trillion cubic metres of gas. But with the gas about to flow, village leaders have now complained bitterly that the company has reneged on its agreements.
In a long letter sent to the Guardian and in telephone conversations, Papuan leaders requesting anonymity have complained that the company has blocked off their fishing grounds, attracted a flood of migrants to the villages, provided very few jobs for local people and is now siding with the Indonesian authorities against native Papuans who are engaged in a long struggle for independence.
"Everything we feared when BP came to the area has come true," claims one community leader. "People are not allowed to catch any fish or shrimps in the exclusive zone established by BP. More and more migrants are coming because of the plant. There is very high inflation because there is lots of money around. The number of local people from Bintuni Bay who work in the project is very low. Local Papuans are never recruited as full-time members of staff."
BP has been desperately keen to avoid the experiences that it, Shell and other oil companies, have had in Africa and Latin America, where oil and gas extraction has left a trail of pollution, human rights abuses and distressed people with no share in the wealth extracted from their land. The company pledged from the start to set new social and environmental standards, and to be a model of corporate social responsibility. It hired some of the best development NGOs to offer advice.
Papuan leaders say they were initially impressed when BP completely rebuilt one fishing village, poured money into the nearby communities, and employed leading environment, human rights and health groups to advise them on how to avoid conflict and bring prosperity to the villages. But as the project has come closer to opening, people have flooded into the area. "Conflicts between local communities and migrants have begun," says the leader. "The migrants [from all over Indonesia] have come here to look for jobs, and are staying. There are about 1,500 in the village of Babo and 1,200 in Bintuni. They are the majority now in all the villages," he says.
The Tangguh gas field, believed to be eventually worth more than £100bn to BP and the Indonesian government, is one of the largest in the world. Known as a "super giant", it is contracted to provide gas for China, Mexico and the US, and should last 30 years.
But the Papuan leaders, who have long been pressing for independence from Indonesia, say they fear that BP is taking sides with the Indonesian government, as they are bypassed from all the lasting benefits. According to documents seen by the Guardian, less than £30m was budgeted for the Tangguh social programme over six years, including money for resettlement and security; nearly £15m was earmarked for "consultants" and administration. The nine most affected villages in the area are being given £15,000 a year for five years, and others in the area £5,500 a year.
"BP has built 100 houses for 100 heads of families. All looks wonderful," another village leader says. "But the people actually suffer mentally from their new settlement. Their access to the sea is limited because of the company's exclusion zone, and they cannot expand their gardens. They do not have enough [space] to expand their families."
Criticism of BP's employment policy was levelled at the company last year and the Tangguh Independent Advisory Panel, chaired by Lord [David] Hannay, to monitor the project, encouraged BP to employ more Papuans and to educate the local population about the "demobilisation" process when the construction work is complete.
Although nearly 6,000 people have been employed in constructing the plant, fewer than 500 will be employed by the company after the building is complete later this year. Of these, only around 50 are expected to be Papuan.
"People's dependency on BP is very high. There will be problems when the work ends. There will be economic and psychological degradation," say Papuan leaders in their letter to the Guardian.
"We predicted that BP and Indonesia would not care about the very survival of the Papuans on their land and their nation. We expected that BP and Indonesia would continuously destroy our forests and our trees and pollute the rivers and seas," they says. "And we feared that BP and Indonesia would bring misfortune for the Papuans by employing skilled workers from outside West Papua, claiming that we Papuans are not 'skilled workers'. I have to tell you that our worst predictions and fears have come true."
BP denies that it is causing environmental damage, or that it is favouring non-Papuans. The company said it is bound by strict guidelines about how many Papuans should be employed. A spokesman says: "We think about 30% of the construction workforce is Papuan. The intention is that there will be long-term employment for Papuans. We are prioritising the most affected villages," says a BP spokesman.
But he also concedes that Papua is large and that it has been difficult to identify who is an original inhabitant of these villages. On the fishing situation, he points out that BP has provided outboard motors to some people so they can travel further to fishing grounds. "We believe we have set new standards for the BP group. There has been a lot of progress but there is no complacency," he says.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH, 19 March 2008
“Raising a flag at a demonstration is a non-violent act, but in Indonesia it can land you in prison. If Indonesia wants recognition as a rights-respecting nation, it should stop imprisoning people for acts of peaceful expression.”
“Crucial Indonesian legal reforms on free expression have no bearing on events in Papua. Unfortunately, once again there is a different set of rules for Papua and other areas with separatist sympathies than for the rest of Indonesia.”
“Committing to the human rights treaties Indonesia recently ratified means more than signing on the dotted line. It means stop punishing people for peaceful acts of expression.”
Elaine Pearson, Deputy Asia director at Human Rights Watch.
19 March 2008
HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH report (see below):
Indonesia: Free Peaceful Protesters in Papua Activists Face Charges for Non-violent Expression
http://hrw.org/english/docs/2008/03/19/indone18314_txt.htm
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH
Indonesia: Free Peaceful Protesters in Papua.
Activists Face Charges for Non-violent Expression.
(London, March 19, 2008) – The Indonesian government should order the immediate release of nine Papua activists arrested for displaying the Papuan Morning Star flag, Human Rights Watch said today. All charges against them should be dropped.
On March 13, police arrested nine people in Manokwari, West Papua, during a demonstration against a 2007 law banning the display of separatist symbols, including the Morning Star Flag. One of the nine in custody is reported to be a 16-year-old boy. Indonesia’s arrest and detention of peaceful activists violates the internationally recognized rights to freedom of expression and assembly.
“Raising a flag at a demonstration is a non-violent act, but in Indonesia it can land you in prison,” said Elaine Pearson, deputy Asia director at Human Rights Watch. “If Indonesia wants recognition as a rights-respecting nation, it should stop imprisoning people for acts of peaceful expression.”
In July 2007, Human Rights Watch welcomed the ruling of the Indonesian Constitutional Court declaring unconstitutional certain provisions in Indonesia’s criminal code prohibiting free expression. Despite the ruling, several Indonesian laws continue to restrict freedom of expression in violation of international law, including article 6 of Government Regulation 77/2007, which prohibits the display of the Morning Star Flag in Papua, the South Maluku Republic Benang Raja flag in Ambon and the Crescent Moon flag in Aceh.
“Crucial Indonesian legal reforms on free expression have no bearing on events in Papua,” said Pearson. “Unfortunately, once again there is a different set of rules for Papua and other areas with separatist sympathies than for the rest of Indonesia.”
Human Rights Watch is also concerned that the nine individuals facing trial for breaching Regulation 77/2007 will also be charged with makar, which translates into English as “rebellion.” In the past, Papuan activists openly supporting separatism have been sentenced to a 20-year prison term for the peaceful expression of their political views. On March 12, two pro-independence demonstrators in the province of Maluku were sentenced to 15 and 17 years in prison for possession of the South Maluku Republic Benang Raja flag.
Human Rights Watch takes no position on Papuan claims to self-determination, but it supports the right of all individuals, including independence supporters, to express their political views peacefully without fear of arrest or other forms of reprisal.
Peaceful campaigning for self-determination is a right protected by international human rights law, including the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which Indonesia ratified in February 2006.
“Committing to the human rights treaties Indonesia recently ratified means more than signing on the dotted line,” said Pearson. “It means stop punishing people for peaceful acts of expression.”
Related Material
“Protest and Punishment: Political Prisoners in Papua”
Report, February 21, 2007
More of Human Rights Watch’s work on Indonesia Country Page
Indonesia: Police Abuse Endemic in Closed Area of Papua Press Release, July 5, 2007 Out of Sight: Endemic Abuse and Impunity in Papua’s Central Highlands Report, July 5, 2007
From: http://hrw.org/english/docs/2008/03/19/indone18314.htm
© Copyright 2003, Human Rights Watch 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th Floor New York, NY 10118-3299 USA
__________________________________________________________
Richard Samuelson
Free West Papua Campaign, Oxford, UK.
www.freewestpapua.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.21.7/1335 - Release Date: 19/03/2008 09:54
© Copyright by w@tchPAPUA
© Copyright by w@tchPAPUA
FREE WEST PAPUA CAMPAIGN (UK)
PO Box 656,
Oxford OX3 3AP, UK.
To: Sir John Sawers,
UK Ambassador to the UN
One Dag Hammarskjold Plaza
885 Second Avenue
New York, NY 10017
E-mail: UK@UN.int
18 February 2008
Dear Sir John,
In your statement on Kosovo made last week (14.2.08)
http://www.britishembassy.gov.uk/servlet/Front?pagename=OpenMarket/Xcelerate/ShowPage&c=Page&cid=1173562367279&a=KArticle&aid=1199212915670
you emphasised that:
"a final settlement ... should be based on the will of the people of Kosovo" and that
"a settlement had to be 'acceptable to the people of Kosovo' ", based on
"the aspirations of the vast majority of Kosovo’s population"
And in your earlier statement on Kosovo (19/12/07) you said:
"We do not challenge the importance of the principle of territorial integrity but, as is well-established, it can be qualified by the exercise of the right to self-determination."
http://www.britishembassy.gov.uk/servlet/Front?pagename=OpenMarket/Xcelerate/ShowPage&c=Page&cid=1173562367279&a=KArticle&aid=1196174571082
We at the Free West Papua Campaign (UK) would be very grateful if you could explain to us and to the people of West Papua why the British Government rejects Serbia's claim to territorial integrity and supports the Kosovar's right to self-determination, which has never been legally recognised by the international community, whilst at the same time the British Government supports Indonesia's claim to territorial integrity and currently rejects the West Papuans' right to self-determination, which has been recognised by the international community?
In the case of Kosovo, the British Government has rightly highlighted the oppression of the Kosovars by the Serbs as an important factor leading to its support for the Kosovar's right to self-determination. We would like to know why the British Government is currently choosing to ignore the brutal oppression of the West Papuans by Indonesia, now and throughout the 45 years of the Indonesian occupation, and to deny the West Papuans' internationally recognised right to self-determination -- which all objective commentators agree has never been legally exercised.
We look forward to receiving your reply.
Yours sincerely,
Richard Samuelson
Co-Director, Free West Papua Campaign, Oxford, UK.
www.freewestpapua.org
INFO PAPUA : United Nations Review
Understanding the Papuans’ call for referendum
The Indigenous Papuans have begun calling for referendum to decide the future political status of Papua province. The call was raised by the Papuan youth. I do think that the same call will be raised in days and months to come.
There are two major factors that trigger the Papuans to call for refendum.
Mar 20, 2008, 22:41
The Indigenous Papuans have begun calling for referendum to decide the future political status of Papua province. The call was raised by the Papuan youth. I do think that the same call will be raised in days and months to come.
There are two major factors that trigger the Papuans to call for refendum.
Firstly, the call for referendum is raised due to the government’s failure in implementing properly and consistently the Law no.21/2001 on the Special Autonomy for Papua Province.
The Papuans know that their problems have already been accomodated in the Papuan autonomy law. Therefore they have been calling upon the government to address their grievances through an effecitve implementation of the law.
However, they see that the government has no moral commitment to put the law into practice. It has even no willingness to enforce the law consistently.
Instead, the government has deliberately produced some policies conflicting against the Papuan autonomy law, after having deliberately postponed for four years to issue the government regulation on the formation of the Papuan People’s Assembly (MRP).
One example is that the central government establishes a new province of West Papua, although by violating the Papuan autonomy law, and imposes upon the Papuans to accept the existence o f the Province .
The government under the leadership of President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono has not issued all necessary government regulations (peraturan Pemerintah), except one on the formation of the MRP, and therefore some articles of the autonomy law can’t be executed in Papua.
Instead, President Yudhoyono has decided to issue new controversial government regulation to accomodate the presence of the West Papua Province.
The regulation on West Papua will make the autonomy law more difficult to be implemented. How can the autonomy law for Papua Province be implemented also in other province?
The House of Representative, on its part, has not considered the implementation of the autonomy law as a solution to address the Papuans’ grievances.Therefore the house never encourges the government to produce necessary government regulations and to do monitoring the Papuan provincial government’s role in implementing the law.
Ignoring the necessity of implementing the autonomy law, the House agreed to form some four new provinces in Papua, namely West Papua, South West Papua, Central Papua, and South Papua.
The Papuan provincial government also never produces the special implementing regulations (Peraturan Daerah Khusus/Perdasus) and provicial regulations (Peraturan daerah Provinsi/Perdasi) which are necessary for implementing properly the autonomy law.
The present governor has even not yet approved the special implementing regulation (Perdasus) on how to spend properly the autonomy fund. As a result, the use of autonomy funds is completedy up to the individual governor and the regents and it can’t be monitored by the people for not having legally approved criteria. Therefore, much of autonomy fund are allegedly misused by the government officials.
The Provincial legislative council (DPRP) still needs to be encouraged to prioritize the implementation of the autonomy law.
So in the eyes of the Papuans, the central government, the House of Representative, the Papuan provincial government and legislative council, all of them fail to implement the autonomy law.
As a result, the Indigenous Papuans’ prosperity is not improved yet. In February of this year, Papuan governor Barnabas Suebu announced that some 80 percents of the total population in Papua province were identified living under poverty line.
It means that the implementation of the law for seven years has never brought about any change in terms of the living standart of the Papuans.
The Papuans have repeatedly called for a comprehesive evaluation on the implementation of the autonomy law by involving the all Papuans in the whole process of the evaluation. The evaluation is meant to jointly identify the obstacles to the enforcement of the law and seek the solutions to remove the obstacles so that the law can be executed properly.
The government never responds to the call for evaluation, however. It means that the government wants to keep repeating the errors it has been committing for seven years.
So, the Papuans already come to the conclusion that the government does not want to implement the autonomy law, properly and consistently, despite its repeated empty promises.
Secondly, the central government has not demonstrated its willingness to engage in peaceful dialogue to settle the Papua case.
The call for dialogue has repeatedly been raised since 2000 by the Papuans and supported all civilian society’s elements in Papua, including the Papuan rebels in the jungle.
However, Jakarta is not interested in the proposed dialogue. It means the government prefers violent approach to settle the Papua case. Perhaps, it is the reason why the central government increases number of troops in Papua.
New military commands are establsihed in newly formed regencies. New military posts are set up along the land border with the Papua New Guinea. New Batalyons are formed. All batalyons are added with more troops. Thousands of troops will be deployed in the future. All these make Papua as the Indonesian military occupied territory.
So the call for refendum is raised due to the government’s failures to implement the autonomy law and its refusal to have dialogue with the Papuans while increasing the number of troops in Papua.
The writer is a lecturer at the Fajar Timur School of Philosophy and Theology in Abepura, Papua.
© Copyright by w@tchPAPUA REPOSTING BY EDOWAY YUNUS
| |
|
| | | 게시자: 2008 5월 8 12:38 의 Deleted member |  West Papua State
 According to the International Law, West Papua does fulfill all requirements for a territory and a people to become independent.
The State Emblem
West Papua State Seal is "Mambruk", which means: The Bird of Peace .There are some basic characteristics of this bird that indicates the identity as a bird of peace: 1. First, this bird only makes noise twice a day, first in the morning, indicating to other beings that the sun has risen; and the second one in the late afternoon to indicate that the sun has set. In comparison: the Bird of Paradise is the most beautiful bird, but the fooliest one, as she makes noise all the time. People mostly catch the bird of paradise because it makes noise all the time. 2. Secondly, "Mambruk" is a bird, which can fly most of the time, but it chooses not to. It is a bird that knows and respects the soil. This incicates how humble this bird is. Humbleness can lead to harmony and peace among each other. Staying on the ground has the philosophy of being earthly, knowing what life is, respecting the source of life and living. 3. The name of the State is not Papua Barat, not in Malay, but iin English:West Papua. Likewise, the slogan "One People - One Soul" is also in English. According to it sonceptor "Grandfather Nicolaas Jouwe, The Morning Star Flag
WEST PAPUA CLAIMING OF FREEDOM BECAUSE OFThe Free West Papua Organisations and Offices. We have found in many parts of the world, that our supporters have misunderstood our organisations and profiles of those organisations mainly because Papuans ourselves have not yet provided clear descriptions of each organisation that are now campaigning for West Papua Independence or commonly called Free West Papua - Papua Merdeka. We are trying to be as objective as possible, presenting all necessary information on various organisations, organs or groups, campaign offices as well as centres and support groups around the world campaigning for Papua Merdeka. Basic West Papua State
Name of the State: West Papua Name of the Nation: Papua Name of Parliament: New Guinea Raad State Emblem: Mambruk Bird National Flag: The Morning Star National Anthem: Hai Tanahku Papua (My Beloved Papua Land) Form of Government: Republic Slogan/ Motto: "One People - One Soul" Proposed Concept of West Papua State
Our Offices
Our Offices means Support Centres or Groups campaigning for West Papua Independence, mainly organised and/or under the leadership of Papuan Leader(s). These offices do not necessarily related to and/or represent the organisations. Even though some offices are related to and supported by certain organisations and/or organs, they tend not to claim such direct affilition in order to unite the movement and campaigns at the world stage. Therefore, below are offices that are campaigning for West Papua Independnce according to their geographical places: Free West Papua Advocacy Team (Oxford, UK)
Free West Papua Advocacy Team (Oxford, UK) was originally set up as Oxford Papua Merdeka (OxPM). The Website of FWAC is <http://www.freewestpapua.org> West Papuan Peoples' Representative Office (WPPRO)
West Papuan Peoples' Representative Office (WPPRO) is based on Port Vila, the capital of the Republic of Vanuatu. The Website of WPPRO is <http://wppro.melanesianews.org/> West Papuan Relief Association (WPRRA)
West Papuan Relief Association (WPPRA) is to be established in Port Moresby, the Capital of the Independent State of Papua New Guinea, Eastern part of New Guinea island, which shares the hald of this Second Largest Island on Earth. The Website of WPPRO is <http://wprra.melanesianews.org> Our Organisations
Core organisations are divided into Main Organisations, Supporting Organisations and Other Organisations. Core Free West Papua Homepages What we mean by "Core Free West Papua Homepages" has three main charcteristics: 1. The website is managed by Papuans ourselves; 2, The website is dedicated solely for West Papua Independence. In other wrods, it presentes other information such as human rights, environmental destruction as such as issues and cases backing up the campaigns for West Papua Independencel; and 3. The website does not support any single organisation, but treat all of them as "our organisations" and present the "real identitiy" of each organisation. It is not our task to judge which one is the "true" one. Our task is to present all of our organisations as they are. Another point to note is that what we are presenting here are not as they (these organisations) say who they are, but according to what we know about who they are. In other words, we present the real identity of each organisation. Main Organisatoins
1. Organisasi Papua Merdeka (OPM)/ Free Papua Movement (FPM) 2. Tentara Revolusi Papua Barat (TRPB)/ West Papua Revolutionary Army (WPRA), previously known as Tentara Pembebasan Nasional (TPN) Papua Barat 3. Presidium Dewan Papua (PDP)/ Presidium of Papua Council 4. West Papua National Coalition for Liberation (WPNCL) 5. Dewan Muyawarah Masydaradkat Adat Koteka (Demmak)/ Koteka Tribal Assembly; Supporting Bodies/ Groups/ Organisations
Supporting bodies, groups or organisations are directly affiliated with one of the above Main Organisations. 1. Aliansi Mahasiswa Papua (AMP) - Allaince of Papuan Students (APS) International; 2. Front Perjuangan Pembebasan Rakyat Papua (Front PEPERA) 3. Papua Ex-Prisoners (TAPOL/NAPOL) 4. Alainsi Perempuan Papua (APP) - Papua Women's Alliance; 5. Dewan Adat Papua (DAP)/ Papua Customary Council (PCC) 6. Panel Papua (PP)/ Papua Pannel 7. Lembaga Masyarakat Adat (LMA) Papua / Papua Peoples Customary Council Other Organisations
Other organisatins do not suppot the OPM ideologically and by principles they tend to campaign ......, but they have the same gaol: Free West Papua. 1. The Fourteen-Star (B-14) Group; 2. West Papua National Youth Awareness Team (WESTPANYET); 3. West Papua Indigenous Organisation (WPIO). http://www.melanesianews.org/3454/ SO NOW WE WANT IMF-UN-EUROPEAN UNION-WORLD BANK MUST STOPPING GIVE DONATIONS TO THE INDONESIA FOR KILLLING WEST PAPUANS BY SPECIAL AUTHONOMY FOUND TO DAY. WE NEVER ASK IT SO FAR BUT WE ONLY NEED REVIEW PEPERA 1969 & "REFERENDUM"  the true is WE are together netralisisir with true DEMOCRACY
| |
|
| | | 게시자: 2008 5월 5 18:58 의 Deleted member |   Yokyakarta [Kamasanpost] - Hari ini tanggl 01 mei 2008 pukul 7:00 wib. Disela-sela memperingati hari buruh sedunia, Ratusan Mahasiswa Papua melakukan Upacara singkat mengenang hari pengintegrasian Bangsa papua secara paksa oleh Pemerintah indonesia kedalam pangkuan ibu pertiwi yang pernah terjadi pada 45 tahun silam (1 Mei 1963).
Wujud dari pada penolakan Integrasi yang dianggap tidak sah itu, secara tegas Mahasiswa dan Masyarakat Papua yang berada diluar pulau Papua (seluruh Pulau Jawa dan Bali) melakukan aksi penolakan Integrasi. Di Yogyakarta, Ratusan mahasiswa dan masyarakat Papua setempat melakukan upacara singkat Mengenang hari terburuk dalam Catatan sejarah bagi bangsa papua. dalam upacara tersebut Bendera Kebangsaan Papua Barat "bintang kejora" dikibarkan dan berkibar selama 45 menit di atas tiang berukuran panjang kurang lebih 4 1/2 meter. Upacara berlangsung tertip dan lagu kebangsaan "Hai Tanahku Papua" mengiringinya.
Mengenang 45th Proses Integrsi Papua Barat Kedalam NKRI Yang Cacat Moral & HukumHari ini demo Buru di Indonesia terjadi secara sopradis dimana-mana menuntut Hak-hak atas kesetarahan dan kesejahterahan. Tetapi bangsa Papua Barat, hari ini bertepatan dengan tragedi pemaksaan pencaplokan wilayah NKRI untuk Papua Barat masuk kedalamnya, Pada 45 tahun silam yang mana 1 Mei 1963. Bagi pemerintah Indonesia, Hari ini diklaim sebagai awal dari integrasi Papua Barat kedalam 'Ibu Pertiwi'. Tetapi bagi Bangsa Papua Barat, hari ini dikenang sebagai praktek-praktek penjajahan Indonesia di Bumi Cenderawasih -Papua Barat. Sekali Lagi Bintang Kejora Berkibar di tanah Kolonial -Jawa Berlangsung dengan penuh hikmat oleh ratusan masa Mayang menghadiri moment Mengenang 45th Proses Integrsi Papua Barat Kedalam NKRI Yang Cacat Moral & HukumDalam Upacara tersebut terlihat jelas, Komdan upacara dan Pengirik Bendera Bintang Fajar serta Rombongan paduan suara yang mengalungkan lagu kebangsaan Hai Tanahku Papua mengiringinya. Upacara berakhir setelah membacakan Pidato politik Eksekutif Nasional Front PEPERA-PB Wilayah Indonesia yang dibacakan Secara langsung oleh Viktor Yeimo didepan peserta upacara pagi tadi. Dalam Disamping membacakan pidato politik Viktor juga menegaskan bahwa : “ Perjuangan pembebasan nasional Papua Barat telah mendarah daging dalam diri seluruh orang Papua Barat berdasarkan kebenaran sejarah itu, sehingga Indonesia, AS, Belanda dan PBB tidak serta merta membiarkan quo vadis ini terus membara di bumi Papua Barat; Indonesia, AS dan Belanda tidak harus bersembunyi di balik layar kebijakan Otonomi Khusus yang ‘ompong’ di Papua Barat; Indonesia tidak harus mengklaim wilayah Papua Barat bagian dari NKRI atas dasar manipulasi sejarah. Indonesia sebagai ketua Komisi Dekolonisasi PBB HARUS kembali mengangkat status politik wilayah Papua Barat sederajat dengan beberepa wilayah-wilayah yang masih harus dimerdekakan secara politk.”Secara singkat berikut pernyataan sikap yang langsung dibacakan di dalam serangkaian Pidato politik tersebut: Dengan demikian, maka kami rakyat Papua Barat, yang tergabung didalam Front Persatuan Perjuangan Rakyat Papua Barat [Front PEPERA PB] Konsulat Indonesia, Jawa Tengah, menuntut: - Kembalikan Kedaulatan Politik Bangsa Papua Barat, 1 Desember 1961 sebagai wujud tanggung jawab Indonesia, Belanda dan AS atas tindakan represif dan manipulatif dalam proses aneksasi wilayah kedaulatan bangsa Papua Barat.
- Hentikan pemaksaan kebijakan Otonomi Khusus dan Pemekaran di Papua Barat.
- Pemerintah Indonesia sebagai ketua Komisi Dekolonisasi terpilih periode tahun 2008 SEGERA mengangkat kembali status politik Papua Barat.
Sampai detik berita ini dituliskan semua masa berlanjut untuk acara dan agenda selanjutnya yang sudah disiapkan. Selanjutnya penulis masih menanti perkembangan untuk laporkan selengkapnya dilaporkan langsung dari tempat kejadian Hari ini. “Perjuangan Tanpa Batas - Merdeka Harga Mati”
Foto-Foto: foto1 : Petugas kibar   foto3 : Pidato Politik Front PEPERA PB Konsulat Indonesia  foto 4 : Berpose depan tiang bendera ------------------------- Sumber: http://kamasanpost.blogspot.com/2008/05/bendera-bintang-kejora-dikibarkan-dalam.html Edisi: 1 Mei 2008
Catatan:Lihat Berita Fotonya
| | Dipublikasi pada Saturday, 03 May 2008 oleh amanai |
|
|
http://www.kabarpapua.com/online/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=856&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0  | |
 | Reportase Peringatan 1 Desember 2007 |  |
 TIMIKA [kabarpapua.com] – Perayaan HUT ke-46 Kemerdekaan Bangsa Papua Barat, Sabtu (1/12) hari ini, diperingati di seluruh Tanah Papua dan Jawa. Bangsa Papua menyambut hari bersejarah ini dengan beragam aksi. Diantaranya dilakukan dalam wujud doa bersama (Oikumene), aksi damai, pawai budaya, dan bahkan pengibaran bendera Bintang Kejora.
Dari Timika dilaporkan, menjelang HUT Papua Barat, tepat jam 03.00 dini hari, sekelompok warga mengibarkan Bendera Bintang Kejora di depan Gereja Katolik Mimika, dan gunung Grastberg. Bendera Bintang Kejora berkibar hingga jam 05.00 WIT.
Pasca pengibaran, aparat gabungan Brimob dan Polisi Militer dengan menggunakan 10 truk dan tank tempur melakukan upaya penurunan bendera. Aparat keamanan juga menahan sedikitnya 15 orang warga, termasuk satu orang jurnalis tabloid Tribune Papua yang saat itu sedang meliput.
Aktivis Front PEPERA Papua yang juga Wakil Sekjend Gunawan Inggeruhi yang berada dan memantau langsung proses tersebut, menjelaskan bahwa peringatan 1 Desember berjalan penuh semangat. Hal itu terlihat dari antusias warga yang cukup tinggi dalam perayaan hari HUT Papua Barat.
Tampaknya situasi di Timika diperkirakan bakal memanas jikalau aparat TNI-POLRI menanggapi aksi tersebut secara berlebihan. Bagi orang Papua, memperingati HUT ke-46 ini sudah merupakan sebuah HAK yang patut dihargai.
Perayaaan Hari Nasional Papua Barat juga dilakukan di Surabaya. Dihadiri berbagai komponen masyarakat Papua se Jawa, Bali dan Makassar. Ketua Front PEPERA PB Konsulat Indonesia, Vicky Yeimo menyebutkan, aksi longmarch dan pawai Budaya dilakukan di Pusat Bundaran Kota Surabaya. Kegiatan tersebut merupakan bentuk keprihatinan atas 46 tahun deklarasi berdirinya negara Papua Barat.
Sebelumnya, aktivis yang berdatangan dari berbagai kota di Pulau Jawa sempat dihadang aparat gabungan dengan alasan sweeping. Di Yogyakarta, sesaat rombongan berangkat ke Surabaya dengan menggunakan 2 buah kendaraan, sejumlah aparat kepolisian langsung mengepung Asrama Kamasan I namun para penghuni tak terpancing keluar.
Sementara itu, Ketua Umum Front PEPERA PB, Selfius Bobii dari dalam LP Klas II Abepura mengingatkan kepada rakyat Papua untuk tetap berjuang demi negeri dan bangsa yang masih terjajah hingga hari hari ini. “Bangsa Papua harus merdeka,” pekiknya.
Bobii juga mengakui bahwa selama beberapa hari terakhir menjelang 1 Desember ini, rekan-rekan yang masih didalam LP Abe mendapat pengawasan ketat dari aparat keamaan. Berbagai bentuk kekerasan pun bahkan masih diterima para aktivis Papua itu.
Selain di kota, perayaan 1 Desember juga diperingati di hutan belantara. Dimana saja orang Papua berada, semangat untuk merdeka masih terus menggema. Tidak hanya nampak dilakukan warga Papua di kota, tetapi juga di berbagai komunitas rakyat Papua baik yang di pedalaman maupun belantara rimba raya.
Meskipun perayaan kemerdekaan Papua Barai tahun ini sempat mendapat perhatian serius dari pemerintah Indonesia. Sebab jauh sebelum hari perayaan, berbagai kebijakan Jakarta dikeluarkan untuk membatasi aspirasi bangsa Papua, teristimewa ditengah kedatangan negara-negara menyongsong acara Pemanasan Bumi yang digelar oleh PBB di Bali.
Pembatasan aspirasi juga dialami aktivis Papua di Bali yang terlibat dalam agenda Perubahan Iklim. Polda Bali dengan cara intimidasi media mengeluarkan ultimatum yang menyudutkan ruang gerak warga Papua di Pulau Dewata. Namun niat Polda tidak menggunakan cara kekerasan, sebab dalam forum Pemanasan Bumi akan diisi dengan tarian eksploitasi alam Papua.
Seruan
Dalam rangka HUT ke-46 Kemerdekaan Bangsa Papua Barat, maka Front PEPERA PB menyatakan kepada kalangan dunia, bahwa:
1. Selamat merayakan HUT Papua Barat yang ke-46.
2. Integrasi Papua selama 46 tahun dengan Indonesia tidak benar. Oleh karena itu, kembalikan Kedaulatan Bangsa Papua Barat!
3. Percepatan aktivitas negara Papua Barat yang universal sama seperti negara-negara lain tuntas dilakukan sebelum tahun 2009.
4. Kami Anti Kolonialis, maka itu dengan segera lepaskan Papua Barat yang Merdeka dalam tatanan kokoh. Papua Barat tidak ingin dicaplok dengan berbagai rekayasa Internasional dan Kolonial Indonesia.
5. Sekali lagi, kami menolak segala upaya pertahankan Papua dengan stigma Federalisasi-Otsus maupun cengkraman Kapitalisme Internasional dan Nasional berkedok pertambangan dan eksploitatif. *** [eksnaspeperapb@yahoo.com] | | Dipublikasi pada Saturday, 01 December 2007 oleh kalibobo |
|
http://www.bebo.com/Profile.jsp?MemberId=1284747260 PUISI kepedihan saat Koonferensi DAP | Senyumlah Mama dan Hapuslah Air Matamu ooh Mama...!!
-- Johanes Adopak (DAP fak-fak)--
Hotel Stn Indah, 1 Juni 2006
Dari hari lepas hari, waktupun terus berlalu
Mengepit pikir tak habis-habisan
Berabad-abad lamanya engkau diperas
Batinmu tersiksa parah
Sebagai putra kandungmu turut merasakan tangisannya mama
Badanmu kurus, lengkung jalanmu
Kain sutramu dulu indah itu, dikoyak-koya
Bahkan kain pinggangmu dilepaskan oleh anak-anakmu sendiri yang serakah Memperkosa mama, hingga dipaksa melepaskan kainmu
Ooh mama, sebagai anak adat rasa sedih hatiku tak berdaya
Kepada siapa aku mengelu Ibu aku anak yatim piatu Tiada bapak.
Bapak tiriku tidak pernah merasakan
Bahkan lirik matapun tiada, selalu sinis padaku
Pace hanya hiaskan anting-anting agogo di telinga
Gelang di tangan dan kalung di leher
Pace tara mau tau, lihat mama yang kurus kerontong
Mama sayangku, tulang-tulangmu sedang diambil
Dagingmu sedang disayat-sayat oleh anak-anak mu sendiri yang mendurhakai Dan darahmu dihisap habis-habisan
Mereka tiada merasakan kandungannya di goroti
Aku berjanji dan bersumpah
Aku datang hari ini Kami bertekad menyuarakan dengan keras
Kami berjuang, untuk siapa kami menuntut merdeka bagi siapa?
Jawablah semua bagi tanamu ini.
Saudaraku masyarakat indonesia
Katakanlah tanah adalah ibu pertiwi
Aku Papua anak baham, Fak-fak
katakanlah tanah ini Bokitiri (putra alam negeri ini) Ibu, mama, putra alamku Hapuslah air matamu Sarunglah kain suteramu, peluklah aku
Bersenyumlah mama,
Lepaskan pelukan gombalmu
yang Terus menerus menipu dan mengambil hasil kekayaan laut
Di darat hutan ditebang dan tambang-tambang emas diambil Lalu kita ditipu, sementara masyarakat Papua miskin papa
Ibarat ayam mati diatas padi
Jangan guraskan hasil kekayaan kami ini terus menerus
Ambil kekayaan kami
Hilangkan adat budaya kami
Bahasa kami dan etnis kami orang Papua
Dan diintimidasi kemudian seluruh dipunahkan.
Ooh..Boki Tiri putri tanah Papua
ini Kami anak-anakmu bersiap-siap terus menerus
Berbicara akan hak-hak kami Sehingga tercapai maksud kami
Yang kami idam-idamkan. Amin
__________________________________
_
Suara hati jeritan Ibu Tanah Papua ini mengatakan kepada anak-anak negeri ini, jangan turut perkosahi dan menderitakan rakyat Papua Segera menuntut melepaskan diri dari cengkeraman ini /Papau segera dimerdekakan!
Suara hati ini dari Masyarakat Papua Baham Matta-Fak-fak
____________
Disadur dari naskah asli bercoretan Penah diatas sehelai kertas kusut—sedandung pedih saat konferensi DAP-- www.bebo.com/PhotoAlbums.jsp?MemberId=1284747260
|
KOYAOOO | |
|
| | | 게시자: 2008 5월 5 06:26 의 Deleted member |
if(typeof correctPNGImage == 'function') {correctPNGImage(document.getElementById('nxt'), 37, 98, 'http://images.friendster.com/images/photo-left.png');} if(typeof correctPNGImage == 'function') {correctPNGImage(document.getElementById('prv'), 37, 98, 'http://images.friendster.com/images/photo-right.png');}  
if(typeof correctPNGImage == 'function') {correctPNGImage(document.getElementById('prv'), 37, 98, 'http://images.friendster.com/images/photo-right.png');}  if(typeof correctPNGImage == 'function') {correctPNGImage(document.getElementById('prv'), 37, 98, 'http://images.friendster.com/images/photo-right.png');}  WE ARE CRYING FOR WEST PAPUA FREEDOM IS GOOD
STOP DECOLONIZATIONS AND DEPORTATIONS TO THE WEST PAPUA
if(typeof correctPNGImage == 'function') {correctPNGImage(document.getElementById('prv'), 37, 98, 'http://images.friendster.com/images/photo-right.png');} 
THE REPOBLIC OF INDONESIA,UNITED NATIONS, USA.GOV, AND OTHERS DO TO THE WEST PAPUANS IS WE STILL WACHING YOU
if(typeof correctPNGImage == 'function') {correctPNGImage(document.getElementById('nxt'), 37, 98, 'http://images.friendster.com/images/photo-left.png');} if(typeof correctPNGImage == 'function') {correctPNGImage(document.getElementById('prv'), 37, 98, 'http://images.friendster.com/images/photo-right.png');} 
| |
|
| | | 게시자: 2008 5월 5 04:50 의 Deleted member |  Front Persatuan Perjuanga Rakyat Papua.(Front Papua)Transisi Demokrasi rakyat hari ini semakin suram. Ruang-ruang kebebasan rakyat semakin tidak jelas. Perubahan era globalisasi yang yang cenderung di katakan sebagian kalangan akan mendorong perubahan rakyat kearah yang lebih baik. Namun nyata sudah hari ini mimpi-mimpi kemajuan rakyat dalam era modern membuktikan penderitaan panjang. Akibat daripada konsolidasi kaum pemodal global, resensi kekuatan rakyat semakin termarjinalkan akibat kekuatan-kekuatan rakyat termoderasi dalam proses nilai kaum pemodal. Bahwa kejayaan Kapitalisme Amerika-Eropa dan Jepang sekarang terus meniadakan nilai-nilai Demokrasi, HAM dan keadilan bagi manusia/rakyat/ Bangsa di belahan penjuru dunia. Orang Jawa, Sumatera, Kalimantan , Amerika maupun Aceh dst- punya masalah yang sama dihadapan mereka. Bangsa Papua Barat dalam mempertahankan hidup tidak terlepas dari perjuangan pula. Nasib dan perubahan nasib patut didukung bagi siapapun. Begitupun Hak menentukan Nasib sendiri merupakan perjuangan sepenuhnya bagi rakyat Papua dan semesta rakyat sipil lainnya. Dalam peradaban perubahan perjuangan menegakkan hak-hak dan kedaulatan bangsa hari ini di Papua Barat terus diperhadapkan pada konsolidasi kaum pemodal dengan meniadakan cita-cita kebebasan. Rangkaian peristiwa dalam spekturm politik yang terjadi di Papua saat ini; cukup memukau di permukaan. Pengibaran Bintang Kejora, Pembakaran Bintang Kejora di Solo (Jateng) bahkan seruan dan mobilisasi kelompok merah putih di Jayapura. Rakyat dipertaruhkan demi keinginan sekelompok orang. Jakarta dalam kendali kapitalisme global (mandor), sebagai konsekwensi rakyat dijadikan bangsa Pasar. Kedaulatan Indonesia bukanlah harga mati, sebab pengorbanan rakyat selama ini dijadikan proyek semata. Demi rakyat-kemerdekaan dan keadilan harus ditegakan dimana-mana. Maka, hak menyatakan pendapat maupun cita-cita menjadi keharusan bagi segenap kaum tertindas di dunia. Perjuangan Papua Barat adalah bagian dari perjuangan rakyat semesta yang hari ini berkeinginan untuk kedaulatan sempurna. Kemerdekaan Papua Barat adalah keharusan yang tak bisa dianggap sepele oleh kelompok manapun-cita dan jiwa demi tanah tumpah darah bagian dari nadi dan darah. Silahkan bagi siapapun yang tidak sepakat dengan kemerdekaan dan kejayaan rakyat Papua dihari ini maupun kedepan bahkan Demokrasi tidak bisa tetap dan diam, keutuhan NKRI (Negara kesatuan republic Indonesia) bukanlah jaminan bagi kemerdekaan dan kebebasan rakyat. Bagi Front Persatuan Perjuangan Rakyat Papua Barat ( Front PEPERA PB) warna dalam irama demokrasi dan kebebasan yang akhir-akhir ini mencuat di Papua maupun di luar Papua merupakan seruan moral dan politik; pengibaran bintang kejora di LP Abepura Papua, Ekspresi politik tarian Sampari mencuat Bintang Kejora maupun pengibaran bintang kejora di tanah Jawa. Kedatangan Senator Amerika beberapa hari lalu di Jakarta merupakan hal biasa yang selalu ada di Negara manapun. Sayangnya, keinginan mengunjungi Papua di cekal oleh Jakarta tanpa alasan jelas. Kami paham bahwa alat-alat pendukung kebijakan penjajah semakin tidak diam untuk meredam seruan rakyat dimana-mana. Baik dari KODIM, KODAM, KORAMIL, BIN, BAKIN dan BAIS tidak lain adalah wajah-wajah pendukung penjajahan. Pembentukan kelompok sipil yang terjadi di beberapa wilayah demi kekuasaan tetap berjalan dilakukan oleh lembaga-lembaga teritori yang selalu bernyanyi mengatasnamakan keutuhan bangsa. Tetapi territorial digiring menjadi anjing penjaga modal; keamanan perusahaan asing di jaga TNI-POLRI super ketat membuktikan bahwa hegemoni nasionalisme Indonesia adalah onani kaum reaksioner. Untuk itu kami menyatakan beberapa persoalan mendasar berkaitan dengan wacana dan gerakan rakyat di Papua maupun kawan-kawan lainnya bahwa; - Tarik dan Bubarkan lembaga-lembaga territorial (BIN-BAIS-BAKIN) dan TNI/POLRI organic-non organic dari Papua Barat demi ruang demokrasi yang kokoh.
- Bubarkan milisi merah putih di Jayapura dan segera bentuk organisasi rakyat merdeka.
- Mendesak Pangdam XVIII Trikora untuk segerah Memindahkan Danrem 172 /PWV, karena dianggap ingin mengacaukan keamanan di Papua, melalui pernyataannya yang dianggap kontrafersi dengan penegakan HAM di Indonesia pada `umu nya dan papua pada khusus nya
- Mengutuk tindakan pembakaran Bendera Bintang Kejora di Solo beberapa waktu lalu sebab semangat rakyat solo dan Papua adalah satu-Kemerdekaan sejati.
- Bebaskan dan hentikan pendekatan persuasive, represif dan militeristik dalam menyelesaikan persoalan.
- Rakyat Papua Barat bersatu padu dalam perjuangan Pembebasan Nasional Papua Barat hari ini dan kedepan.
Demikian siaran pers ini kami sampaikan kepada rakyat semesta; orang Papua yang mulia. Terimakasih. Port Numbay-Papua Barat, 09 Juli 2007 Arkilaus Baho Jurubicara Nasional http://hendrikofirman.wordpress.com/2007/07/14/front-persatuan-perjuanga-rakyat-papuafront-papua/#comment-50 | |
|
| | | 게시자: 2008 3월 1 17:44 의 Deleted member |  THIS IS THE RIIL HISTORY IN WEST PAPUA TODAY http://armyrireadytokillpapuans.blog.dada.net/
PEMERINTAHAN NKRI DAN MILITER NKRI ADALAH YANG SUKA BERMAIN-MAIN DENGAN KEBENARANG BANGSA LAIN, DENGAN MENGANDALKAN KEKUATANG ALAT NEGARA YANG TIDAK MENDEKATI PADA JIWA DAN RASA KEMANUSIAAN, YANG SEBENARNYA BUKAN PADA ZAMANNYA
TENTARA NASIONAL INDONESIA(TNI-POLRY) TELAH MAHIR UNTUK BERANTAS BANGSA PAPUA BARAT YANG PENUH DENGAN GENOCIDE DAN RASISME BAIK YANG NYATA DAN YANG TERSEMBUNYI. SUTU CARA YANG NKRI SAAT INI SEDANG PAKI ADALAH PELATIHAN DI TEMPAT LAIN DAN PRAKTEK DI PAPUA BARAT
PENEKANAN PEMERINTAHAN NKRI UNTUK PAPUA TETAP DALAM NKRI ADALAH MELANGGAR DEKLARASI PBB DAN UNDANG-UNADANG DASAR NKRI ALINEA KE 4 DAN PANCASILA.UUD 1945 DAN PANCASILA MATI KARENA MILITER INDONESIA DAN PEMERINTAHAN NKRI DI PAPUA BARAT YANG TIDAK MAU MENGAKUI KEMERDEKAAN BANGSA DAN NEGARA PAPUA BARAT SELAMA INI.  TAPI AKAN ADA MURKA TUHAN TU, PEMERINTAHAN NKRI BERSIAP-SIAPLAH UNTUK MEMBAYAR SEMUA KERUGIAN NYAWA BANGSA PAPUA BARAT YANG MELEBIHI 100JUTA MANUSIA PAPUA DAN SELURUH KERUGIAN DARI PADA SEGALAH KEKAYAAN ALAM BANGSA PAPUA BARAT DI MEJA HIJAU PBB NANTI. ALAT NEGARA DAN MILITER RI (TNI-POLRI-INTELIJEN) BUKANLAH SUATU SOLUSI BAGI PAPUA BARAT PROSES PEMEKARANG ADALAH PROSES PENGADUHDOMBAH BANGSA PAPUA BARAT DANA OTONOMI KHUSUS ADALAH PEMBUKA LAHAN TERBESAR DIDUNIA BAGI PARA KORUPTOR DI PAPUA BARAT. OTONOMI KHUSUS PAPUA BARAT ADALAH SUATU USAHA NEGARA UNTUK MEMBUNTUTI JALUR DAMAI DAN DEMOKRASISASI BAGI BANGSA PAPUA BARAT UNTUK DEKOLONISASI DAN DEMILITERISASI NEGARA REPOBLIK INDONESIA. 
Pemekaran Provinsi
Dalam sambutanya Bupati A.P.You mengatakan bahwa akan dimekarkan Tiga Kecamatan dalam tahun ini, dan akan di bentuk dan diresmikan Pemekaran Kabupaten Dogiyai sebagai Busur Panah Jitu artinya sebagai kabupaten penentu terbentuknya Provinsi Papua Tengah, dan Dia tidak mematuhi Keputusan Pemerintah Daerah Provinsi Papua yang Membatasi segalah Pembentukan dan Pemekaran Papua dimulai dari pemekaran Kecamatan, Kabupaten Provinsi. Dia pun juga menjanjikan Masyarakat Nabire akan di bagi bagikan Uang tiap-tiap desa Rp 100 Juta, untuk membujuk dan memadam kekhawatiran segalah pemekaran daerah ini. Pada saat Pelantikan Bupati dan Wakil Bupati Paniai Gubernur Bas Suebu juga Mengatakan bahwa Pemekaran Propinsi Papua Sudah Ditundah dan Hanpir tidak akan diadakan Pemekaran lagi sebab Dana Otonomi Khusus Papua 90% Hilan di Birokrasi Sedangkan yang menikmatio Oleh Rakyat Papua adalah Hanya 10% Dari dana yang di kucurkan Oleh Pihak Luar Negeri Lewat Jakarta itu. Dia juga mengatakan bahwa di Papua Hanya 2 juta jiwa lebih saja tidak bisa mensejahterahkan, di banding Pulau Jawa yang sekian Melebihi Berlipat ganda penduduk saja sudah penganggurannya berkurang. Sedangkan kaum pekerja di papua saat ini di perkirakan 20% selebihnya itu nganggur begitu saja. Artinya pemekaran /Otsus/MRP bukanlah suatu solusi namun menambah Persoalan semakin Rumit. Yang Masyarakat Butuh Saat Ini Yang kami Masyarakat butuh saat ini adalah bukan pemekaran tapi pembangunan, Pemberdayaan, Kepedulian, Perhatian untuk mengankat harkat dan martabat masyarakat pribumi setempat. Pandangan Masyarakat Papua selama 42 tahun Papua di Pangkuan RI Daerahku adalah Hanyalah Sampah NKRI, Masyarakatku adalah Masyarakat yang Tertinggal Jauh dari Perkembangan Jaman Globalisasi Dunia dan Bangsaku adalah Bangsa Yang dilupakan oleh NKRI dan PBB serta bangsa –bangsa lain di dunia. NKRI telah lama menisolasikan Negeriku dengan Saudara-saudara sebangsa Seras sewarna Kulit Melanesia di pacific. Sesungguhnya saya adalah bangsa Pasific bukan asia. Dengan kesadaran sebagai bangsa kulit hitam, Ras Melanesia, diufuk barat bagian selatan pasifik adalah Bangsa yang terhina di Ibu Pertiwi. Dan usahanya untuk memusnakan saya dan bangsaku Di Negara yang namanya NKRI ini. Saya Tidak Mengerti Orang-orang Papua yang menjadi Hamba Uang dan Jabatan bagi NKRI dan Mereka ingin mau menerima itu atas dasar Paksaan/Keterpaksaan padahal Orang Papua sudah dengan sesungguhnya Tolak OTONOMI KHUSUS PAPUA, PEMEKARAN, MRP itu dll. Kenapa ? Orang Papua sendiri tidak mau bekerja untuk diri kita sendiri. Mari kita bersatu dan perjuangkan kemerdekaan Papua. Pesan saya Pejabat Pribumi Papua Jangan anda buta dengan Uang dan Jabatan Tapi lihatlah Bangsamu, Negrimu, Warna Kulitmu, Rambutmu, sebab sesungguhnya Masalah Rasisme sudah di Hapus di dunia termasuk NKRI-PAPUA. Kepunahan Orang Papua adalah Pembantaian Ras Melanesia selama 42 tahun Papua berada di Pangkuan NKRI/IBU PERTIWI INI. Itu sudah terbukti NKRI tidak mau Orang Papua tapi Mereka Hanya butuh Kekayaan Papua. “Merdeka adalah Harga Mati” “One Man One Vote” “REFERENDUM “ “SELF DETERMINATIONS “ WE MUST BE HAVE OWNER NATIONS, COUNTRY, Bukan Uang, Jabatan, Pemekaran, Otonomi Khusus Papua, Majelis Rakyat Papua. ITU BUKAN TUJUAN KITA TUJUAN KITA HANYA SATU MERDEKA (TO BE A NEW NATION) WITHOUT NKRI Untuk Papua Merdeka Bangsa Indonesia Di Berberapa Propinsi Telah dan sedang Mendukung Papua Merdeka sudah Hampir sampai 100%. Misalnya dipulau jawa sendiri sudah mencapai 95% dan Sulawesi 72% Kalimantan 86% Sumatra 73 % dll. Sekarang bagaimana dengan Pemerintahan daerah Papua, yang buta dengan Jabatan dan Rupiah itu. Menurut hasil pantauan dan penelitian Kami, semua itu kami paparkan disini. Saat Ini Kesadaran di semua Pihak sangat Di Butuhkan, Kalau Tidak Kita Akan Kehilangan Segalah Galanya.kalau tidak kita akan kehilangan Segala-galanya: misalnya hilangnya Nyawa saudara-saudara satupersatu, hilangnya kekayaan alam kita, hilangnya Hargadiri kita, hilanya martabat kita sebagai bangsa papua dll. I NEED YOU HAVE NO MORE COMMENTS AND FOLLOW ME IT MYWAY, OUR WAY TO BE FREE AS SOON AS ANEW NATIONS IN OUR HOME LAND WEST PAPUA BY YOUNG BLOODY OF ME OPM
http://armyrireadytokillpapuans.blog.dada.net/ | |
|
|
|
|
| |
| | |
